Originally posted by BoxingChaos
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why are people surprised about the way Dirrel fought?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by 2501 View PostHave you guys not watched his fights? He did the same **** against Curtis Stevens. Harold Lederman said, "This is the worse fight I've ever seen."
Regardless of the way he fought, regardless of the clinching and elusive BOXING, HE STILL DID MORE THAN FROCH!!!
I understand if Froch was going in there, controlling the fight with his aggression, but he WASN'T. The only effective activity Froch had was the wrestling. Look, I HAAAAAAAAAAATEEEEEE the way Dirrell fought. Hopkins fought in a similar manner against Wright when he would punch and hold. It sucks. Its not nice to look at. It's not entertaining.
But the fact of the matter is, Dirrell landed more effective punches. That is what counts when deciding a winner in a fight. Who was more effective. As a matter of fact, I challenge ANYONE who believes that Froch won to point out when and what part of the fight Froch was being effective and we can discuss blow by blow.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dknight View PostThose impressed with Dirrell's performance must have some pretty low standards in boxing. He can't slug it out with Froch and 3 more rounds he would've been KTFO, I think.
Dirrell is not known for his power or inside fighting, why the hell should he do something stupid like slugging it out with Froch when he clearly has advantages in speed and boxing skills over him?
Comment
-
Originally posted by reedickyaluss View PostYou look like a moron to everyone.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mangler jr View PostHow ignorant can people be?
Dirrell is not known for his power or inside fighting, why the hell should he do something stupid like slugging it out with Froch when he clearly has advantages in speed and boxing skills over him?
Froch wasn't spectacular either, but out of the 2 he was the better warrior.
Comment
-
you should actually watch the fight you ******, dirrell fought nothing like he did against stevens, he said himself he felt that fight was a loss and felt embarressed for himself, for the froch fight i saw dirrell standing in the centre of the ring and counter froch there was running for about a minute in round 2 or somethin but that was it
Comment
-
Originally posted by dknight View Postexcellent point, which brings the next question: Then why didn't he shine from the outside with his "skills"? He looked so unprofessional on balance alone. I say if you can't compete, don't even try, because he didn't look good.
froch wasn't spectacular either, but out of the 2 he was the better warrior.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dknight View PostExcellent point, which brings the next question: Then why didn't he shine from the outside with his "skills"? He looked so unprofessional on balance alone. I say if you can't compete, don't even try, because he didn't look good.
Froch wasn't spectacular either, but out of the 2 he was the better warrior.
Comment
Comment