Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Solido v Lomenchenko was a horrible robbery.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Solido v Lomenchenko was a horrible robbery.

    Not only did Lomenchenko win the fight on my score card by 2 rounds, nearly ko-ing solido, also computer box showed lomenchenko outlanding Solido. But the amount of Low blows Solido did should have resulted in disqualification.

    This is on par with Amir khan lemont peterson robbery.

  • #2
    Originally posted by slimshandy69 View Post
    Not only did Lomenchenko win the fight on my score card by 2 rounds, nearly ko-ing solido, also computer box showed lomenchenko outlanding Solido. But the amount of Low blows Solido did should have resulted in disqualification.

    This is on par with Amir khan lemont peterson robbery.
    European fighters are all garbage . Seriously tho get off their d*ck it's past obvious now.

    Comment


    • #3
      Salido should have been DQ'd for all those low blows. Lousy refereeing.

      Wasn't a robbery though, Loma didn't do enough and its a fight he shouldn't have been in anyway. A title shot in his second pro fight? Ridiculous .

      And at people excusing Salido's low-blows by bringing up Loma's clinching. Even when clinching is excessive, it takes quite a lot of it to get a point taken away. When someone lands 40 low blows without the ref saying "BOO" about it, there's a big problem.
      Last edited by Derranged; 06-16-2014, 05:19 PM.

      Comment


      • #4
        Lomachenko won like 4 rounds, he didn't let his hands go until like the 8th round and he didn't almost KO salido. He had him hurt.

        Comment


        • #5
          We are in the minority, but I agree with TS. Salido wasn't even attempting to land anything other than low blows

          Comment


          • #6
            I actually agree. Salido should have been penalized for the low blows too. **** him!!

            Comment


            • #7
              Punished for low blows yeah I agree but not Loma got his head popped back time and time again


              Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Derranged View Post
                Salido should have been DQ'd for all those low blows. Lousy refereeing.

                Wasn't a robbery though, Loma didn't do enough and its a fight he shouldn't have been in anyway. A title shot in his second pro fight? Ridiculous .

                And at people excusing Salido's low-blows by bringing up Loma's clinching. Even when clinching is excessive, it takes quite a lot of it to get a point taken away. When someone lands 40 low blows without the ref saying "BOO" about it, there's a big problem.
                comparing clinching to deliberate low blows

                either obvious troll attempt or incredibly fucking stupid lol

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by slimshandy69 View Post
                  Not only did Lomenchenko win the fight on my score card by 2 rounds, nearly ko-ing solido, also computer box showed lomenchenko outlanding Solido. But the amount of Low blows Solido did should have resulted in disqualification.

                  This is on par with Amir khan lemont peterson robbery.
                  I don't think it was a robbery or a bad decision, what was bad though was the blatantly terrible refereeing in that fight. Salido should have been DQd or at the very least docked 2 points.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Who cares it was a horrible fight.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP