Its hard to imagine Froch winning against Eubank......But then its hard to imagine Froch beating anyone! He does though, he finds away and his awkward style works for him! Id favour Eubank over him though and most certainly Nigel Benn but The Cobra has shocked me a few times now so u cant count the man out
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Eubank or Froch - Who is better
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by The Surgeon View PostIts hard to imagine Froch winning against Eubank......But then its hard to imagine Froch beating anyone! He does though, he finds away and his awkward style works for him! Id favour Eubank over him though and most certainly Nigel Benn but The Cobra has shocked me a few times now so u cant count the man out
Even Kessler, would get torn apart by Benn and outclassed by Eubank.
No way Froch beats any of these two.
But Froch-Benn would be entertaining.
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by Legendary Hater View PostAll things considered, these two are about the same level...
Good B fighters at their best...as in, not Top 10 P4P material in their respective eras...
Froch could surpass Eubank depending on how successful he is in the future...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sparked_1985 View PostFroch would comfortably beat the Eubank that Steve Collins beat and would have probably hung in there with a prime Eubank. Eubank would switch off and Froch could get his work done.
Froch could have existed comfortably in that era. They are all exciting but flawed fighters.
Let's be fair to Froch, he is slow at elite level but it takes someone as good Ward to take the play completely away from him. Ward is potentially a great, as long as his handlers aren't too careful with him.
Comment
-
eubank=english sven ottke
how he got to 41-0 is a mystery(not really paid off judges) he probably should of had about 10 losses by that time. when he was fighting everyone thought he was a fraud but because he got huge ratings they kept giving him fights that he lost so he kept his undefeated record. now that he's retired he's great? get outta here. he did beat some good fighters but most of the time he just fought to the level of his competition which was usually shabby. i suggest people actually watch his career set. froch has a chance against eubank of course.Last edited by daggum; 12-20-2011, 10:27 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by daggum View Posteubank=english sven ottke
how he got to 41-0 is a mystery(not really paid off judges) he probably should of had about 10 losses by that time. he did beat some good fighters but most of the time he just fought to the level of his competition which was usually shabby. i suggest people actually watch his career set. you will be like wat!
The thing was he could be in utter classics like the first Benn fight or the Watson rematch that was just epic. He looked at times like he could beat Collins but didn't. Fighting down to levels is an apt description.
Comment
-
Originally posted by crold1 View PostTen might be a bit much but there were some questionable calls. I thought Watson I for instance was horrid.
The thing was he could be in utter classics like the first Benn fight or the Watson rematch that was just epic. He looked at times like he could beat Collins but didn't. Fighting down to levels is an apt description.
his whole "undefeated image" was just hype so people would tune in and see him fight(like mayweather) and it worked because he got great ratings. his record is much better than he actually is but he's still a good fighter no doubt.Last edited by daggum; 12-20-2011, 10:48 PM.
Comment
Comment