I agree with Crawford, he dismantled Postol, while I had Gamboa winning 4-1 and giving him a lot of trouble with his explosiveness and elusive movements.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Crawford: Yuriorkis Gamboa is Still The Toughest Fight I've Had
Collapse
-
-
-
Stupid comparison. Come on.
This is like Bradley vs Provodnikov in which Bradley was seen disrespecting and underestimating Provo and thus he was too proud to run. Did you see Bradley do the same when he fought Marquez? Come on.
Comment
-
Clearly.
Gamboa was the better fighter, he was just entirely too small. He was outboxing Crawford with ease (4-1), but weight classes exist for a reason and the size difference changed the fight.
Gamboa was a 126lb fighter up at 135 and Crawford is a big 140lb fighter who drained to 135.Last edited by gmc_rfc_06; 07-24-2016, 11:03 AM.
Comment
-
I've always said Gamboa might have won if they were the same size, he hurt him right before he got stopped.
Can't believe Gamboa wasted his career, he was always fun to watch, shouldn't have skipped the Rios fight and destroyed a great career.
Comment
-
Originally posted by WesternChamp View Postif gamboa was your toughest fight.. pac will run circles around you. just ask the guy who hired you as his sparring partner....
Comment
-
Originally posted by gmc_rfc_06 View PostClearly.
Gamboa was the better fighter, he was just entirely too small. He was outboxing Crawford with ease (4-1), but weight classes exist for a reason and the size difference changed the fight.
Gamboa was a 126lb fighter up at 135 and Crawford is a big 140lb fighter who drained to 135.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ironmike2012 View PostI've always said Gamboa might have won if they were the same size, he hurt him right before he got stopped.
Can't believe Gamboa wasted his career, he was always fun to watch, shouldn't have skipped the Rios fight and destroyed a great career.
Comment
Comment