Originally posted by Barcham
View Post
I'm not a lawyer, nor do I pretend to be one. But perhaps you're not familiar with the terms of a plea deal. Maybe they aren't saying that he had sex with children as part of the deal, so you can't rule out that he has. In addition, how is being in possession of child ****ography (with a child as young as 6) not qualify you as a pedo? You're assuming that he just held onto it because he was being a good Samaritan to other pedos and distributing it, while not looking at it and getting off on it in any way? Since you're so hard up on definitions, the definition of a pedophile is someone who is sexually attracted to children(yes pre-pubescent). So long as he gets off to children makes him a pedo, whether or not he physically had sex with them is irrelevant in this case.
Further, Direct quote from the article:
"Fogle received many of the videos Taylor distributed and had full knowledge of the minors’ statuses, as well as the means by which the secretive videos were produced."
Hence, he had child ****ography making him a pedo. By definition.
Thanks for coming out.
Comment