Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Sanchez: If GGG Breaks Hopkins' Record, Mayweather May Come

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21

    Comment


    • #22
      Listen to this fool. Hopkins never held any meaningless trinkets.

      Golovkin has just 5 WBA defences . They did not sanction the Brook fight
      And just 2 IBF defences.

      He is years away from breaking that record.

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by BIGPOPPAPUMP View Post
        If GGG Breaks Hopkins' Record, Mayweather May Come

        Nah.....

        'If GGG Breaks Hopkins' Record, Mayweather', will ask " who did he beat " ?

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by Burt Saxby View Post
          Listen to this fool. Hopkins never held any meaningless trinkets.

          Golovkin has just 5 WBA defences . They did not sanction the Brook fight
          And just 2 IBF defences.

          He is years away from breaking that record.
          He's defended some title 17 straight times. I guess most count regular belt defenses including Hopkins who on Hbo acknowledged Ggg is fast approaching his record.

          Which one of those belts is meaningless? Even when he only held the regular he was a much better champ than super champ Sturm

          Comment


          • #25
            Why the obsession with stuff Abel Sanchez says?

            It's even worse than the old headlines about Floyd Sr and Freddie Roach.

            People really get a kick out of playing dumb, taking the fighter's hype man seriously, feigning shock when they know it's a joke anyway.

            Comment


            • #26
              p
              Originally posted by don larryx View Post
              they are literally making up this mans title defenses now...First they counted the damn regular WBA title defense..now in his last defense the WBA was not even on the line and they still somehow add it to his title defenses?
              Of course GGG haters want so bad to have those regular defenses not count, even though.

              This question had long ago been ****ing answered, the title Gennady won vs Nunez is the same one that Hagler defended vs Hearns. There was no super.

              And GGG should be recognized as the real camp since he got the regular WBA, because it was Sturm that started the great tradition of of GGG ducking. Geale too, GGG would have broken the record by now if not for Sturm cowardness. If GGG was like Jacobs are refusing to fight Sturm or Geale, it'd be one thing.

              But those guys were falling over themselves running from him.

              Where the old timers only had to fight for one belt to be the best, now you have to unify to know with 100% certainty.

              And for gods sakes, do you believe all of b-hops defenses came under one belt. Just because no WBA title was up for grabs doesn't mean it's not a title defense. Nothing in record books says it has to be the same title. And he still owned the WBA.

              So you could say he's only defended the WBA title 16 times. He still has 17 straight title defenses.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by HeroBando View Post
                He's defended some title 17 straight times. I guess most count regular belt defenses including Hopkins who on Hbo acknowledged Ggg is fast approaching his record.

                Which one of those belts is meaningless? Even when he only held the regular he was a much better champ than super champ Sturm
                All the WBA defences he made prior to beating Geale were the same as the WBA defences Jacobs is making now.
                Are we counting Danny Jacobs reigning MW Champ now as well?

                It doesn't matter if somebody thought he was better. He wasn't well known back then and held basically what is an interim title.

                His WBA defence count is 5 at this juuncture. 17?? lmao

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by Progrssive_Jedi View Post
                  p

                  Of course GGG haters want so bad to have those regular defenses not count, even though.

                  This question had long ago been ****ing answered, the title Gennady won vs Nunez is the same one that Hagler defended vs Hearns. There was no super.
                  .
                  No dummy. He won an interim title of Nunez. Sturm had the same WBA belt Hagler defended.

                  Golovkin didn't get Hagler's belt till he fought Geales. Danny Geale lol. Amazing achievement ..

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by Progrssive_Jedi View Post
                    p


                    So you could say he's only defended the WBA title 16 times. He still has 17 straight title defenses.
                    Povetkin has 5 WBA title defences . Nobody acknowledges him as a world HW Champion.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by don larryx View Post
                      they are literally making up this mans title defenses now...First they counted the damn regular WBA title defense..now in his last defense the WBA was not even on the line and they still somehow add it to his title defenses?

                      Originally posted by HanzGruber View Post
                      Team GGG sells lies still. He has 6 defenses of the super belt. Nobody cares about his weak ass ibo or regular wba defenses

                      I can't believe that the boxing media is silent about that, wtf ?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP