Tweet
they were still in their 20s back then..
now it changed to they have been in too many wars.. hahahaha
now it changed to they have been in too many wars.. hahahaha
-
-
-
The old and too many wars excuse is 1 and the same. Nobody meant they were old in actual age.Comment
-
You can be shot in your 20s, ask Vargas.Comment
-
they were shopworn. at least Morales was. they had been fighting wars at the champioship level since they were 21...Originally posted by GreenMan View Post
you should still give credit to Pacquiao, but dont go overboard. his wins over Morales arent much better than his win over David Diaz.
the 1st Barrera win is still the best win of his career, imoComment
-
nobody is SHOT at 20s !!!! they have just been exposed as B level fighter..
how come pacquiao still isnt shot !Comment
-
lol b-level? Barrera and Morales are legends, buddy.Originally posted by GreenMan View PostComment
-
he hasnt been in as many wars as they have.Originally posted by GreenMan View Post
and he hasnt got that much longer, imo. a few more tough fights just might do it.
besides, these were the in their very late 20s.
Barrera wasnt shot in the first fight, although imo he was a tiny bit past his bestComment
-
pacquiao has been into too many wars and yet he is still going strong, better than ever
i call BS indeed. just to downplay the legendComment
-
Originally posted by blackirish137 View Post
I agree with this post. And yeah, Pacquiao should get full cred for beating Barrera, I can't take anything away from that win.Comment
Comment