Tweet
Who is right on this issue?? Cintron or Williams??? if your the Comish do you grant the lic back or no?? easy questions....why or why not? poll on it's way!
Excerpt from ESPN article
Many boxers are equally divided on the punishment for Margarito, who's expected to plead his own case Tuesday in Los Angeles.
Kermit Cintron, who was stopped by Margarito in April 2005 and again in April 2008 for the only two losses of his career, told The Associated Press last week he suspects Margarito had illegal wraps on his hands during their bouts.
"I think he had stuff in his gloves, [but] that's just my opinion," Cintron said, replying with an expletive when asked what he thought about Margarito being allowed to fight in Mexico. "You look at those losses, and I don't know how it happened. You guys saw what he did before they caught him."
Multidivisional star Paul Williams, who beat Margarito in a narrow unanimous decision in July 2007, has a much more conciliatory attitude.
"You don't have any proof," Williams said. "I don't think the man should be banned, because that's how he makes his living. I think he should pay a bigger fine, but you can't take away a man's livelihood when there's no proof he's been doing it every time."
Excerpt from ESPN article
Many boxers are equally divided on the punishment for Margarito, who's expected to plead his own case Tuesday in Los Angeles.
Kermit Cintron, who was stopped by Margarito in April 2005 and again in April 2008 for the only two losses of his career, told The Associated Press last week he suspects Margarito had illegal wraps on his hands during their bouts.
"I think he had stuff in his gloves, [but] that's just my opinion," Cintron said, replying with an expletive when asked what he thought about Margarito being allowed to fight in Mexico. "You look at those losses, and I don't know how it happened. You guys saw what he did before they caught him."
Multidivisional star Paul Williams, who beat Margarito in a narrow unanimous decision in July 2007, has a much more conciliatory attitude.
"You don't have any proof," Williams said. "I don't think the man should be banned, because that's how he makes his living. I think he should pay a bigger fine, but you can't take away a man's livelihood when there's no proof he's been doing it every time."
Comment