Floyd is magic in the ring--manny stands no chance

[fdotorres]

ummm...let's see---from my knowledge--castillio lost twice to floyd---didn't he---there's your oops...

the general consensus is that he lost the first fight

here's my oops:

The Judge’s scores read as follows:

John Keane of England – 115-111 for Mayweather
Jerry Roth of Nevada- 115-111 for Mayweather
Anek Hongtongkam of Thailand-116-111 for Mayweather

Harold Lederman of HBO had it-115-111 for Castillo.

All the announcers, including Foreman had Castillo ahead.

My score was 116-111 for Castillo.

The Punch Stats:

Castillo Mayweather

203 Thrown 157
506 Landed 448

40% Percentage 35%

Power Punching Stats:

Castillo Mayweather

173 Landed 66
377 Thrown 151

46% Percentage 44%

[fdotorres]

errrrrr but would u not class castillo as a bum loser bag of cr@p etc etc

but he gave floyd a disputed decision victory and then a competitive clear decision for floyd it was not a easy fight for floyd everyone knows that

noessss mayweather has no equal! Castillo never had a chance, it wasn't even close omgzzz!!

[Guneesh]

[Guneesh]

[cherokee]

you sure about that kid? i don't think you really believe that...and if you do---care to tell me why---care to break the fight down--remember your last post---you put you "believe"--and i put manny fighter's fans that fight floyd believe with their hearts, not their minds--i put floyd "will" dominate manny--and manny stands no chance against him---this is not a belief--this is a fact---a guaranteed fact---

and by the way, sorry to disappoint you but nothing in your analysis is new. heard and read them all before countless times

[pbftxrs316]

and by the way, sorry to disappoint you but nothing in your analysis is new. heard and read them all before countless times

and by the way--no you haven't---coz ifyou have you have--you would have rebuttled it with a better argument than this ****--

[cherokee]

and by the way--no you haven't---coz ifyou have you have--you would have rebuttled it with a better argument than this ****--

if you say so..just keep babbling! it's your right to do so

see you here on March 14

[fdotorres]

and by the way--no you haven't---coz ifyou have you have--you would have rebuttled it with a better argument than this ****--

not everyone wastes time as much as you do in analyzing things and making stupid predictions like "mayweather will fight paul williams"

[S A M U R A I]

100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

[pbftxrs316]

the general consensus is that he lost the first fight

here's my oops:

The Judge’s scores read as follows:

John Keane of England – 115-111 for Mayweather
Jerry Roth of Nevada- 115-111 for Mayweather
Anek Hongtongkam of Thailand-116-111 for Mayweather

Harold Lederman of HBO had it-115-111 for Castillo.

All the announcers, including Foreman had Castillo ahead.

My score was 116-111 for Castillo.

The Punch Stats:

Castillo Mayweather

203 Thrown 157
506 Landed 448

40% Percentage 35%

Power Punching Stats:

Castillo Mayweather

173 Landed 66
377 Thrown 151

46% Percentage 44%

the general concenus can have their opinions---floyd beat castillio twice---the 1st one in a close fight---that's it--you can keep your stats to yourself---you see--it's funny arguing with posters like you--you make it so easy on me to make you look foolish--you, rather than acutally argue about manny pac vs floyd, bring up castillio from 2002---if you don't have any decent facts as to why manny wil beat floyd, just come out and post it--don't bring up old fights--that cracks me up--and again only furthers my point as to why posters on here post nonsense--can you even break the fight down between manny and floyd--and leave the castillio fight be---or is it that you can't and once again use a scapegoat to admit it...