Originally posted by crold1
View Post
Joe Louis was the first black heavyweight in a generation and helped to break the color barrier. The Louis - Schmelling fight had HUGE historical significance. We had the irony of white Americans, including many racists, rooting for a black man who was fighting a symbol of Aryan supremacy. So, off course the extra-boxing significance counts in what we think of the man.
I suppose we need to have another thread of who were the 20 "best" fighters of the 20th C, as opposed to who were the "greatest". And, I guess, that would be problematic too as we could parse the word "best" in the same way we parse "great."
Let's play with history for a while and go back to the Gatti / Mayweather fight. Imagine that Gatti had a better chin (how is that possible?) and let's say that Mayweather punished Hatton for 11+ rounds and get's KOed in the 12th.
I would say that Mayweather was the better fighter but guts, willingness to take punishment, determination, and extraordinary stamina won the fight for Gatti. I'm a big Gatti fan and don't like Mayweather's public persona but who in the world could possibly say, even in the above scenario, that Gatti was a better boxer than Mayweather?
I guess that's enough rambling for the moment. And I don't even have alcohol as an excuse.
Comment