We know there are some terrible judges and everyone has personal bias
What about adding 2 more judges to make 5. They all score the fight but the highest and lowest scores if you like are discarded and only the 3 middle scores are counted. That eliminates biased judges. Figureskating and other sports with judging do this.
so for example, let's say there is a fight and boxer A clearly beats boxer B but it's not a total ass kicking and let's say the scores are (boxer A first)
117-113
116-113
114-115 (this judge has a ridiculous bias towards boxer B and somehow made him the winner)
120-108 (this judge had a bit too much bias towards boxer A)
117-113
The two 'bad' scores are rejected leaving 3 sensible scores.
What about adding 2 more judges to make 5. They all score the fight but the highest and lowest scores if you like are discarded and only the 3 middle scores are counted. That eliminates biased judges. Figureskating and other sports with judging do this.
so for example, let's say there is a fight and boxer A clearly beats boxer B but it's not a total ass kicking and let's say the scores are (boxer A first)
117-113
116-113
114-115 (this judge has a ridiculous bias towards boxer B and somehow made him the winner)
120-108 (this judge had a bit too much bias towards boxer A)
117-113
The two 'bad' scores are rejected leaving 3 sensible scores.
Comment