Don't You Fkn Hate Conspiracy Theorists...Or Are YOU One Of Them?

[Mike Tyson77]

I saw 3 large cargo planes flying at night together over a rural area, explain that.

[ZeeBrah]

It was a conspiracy between Timothy McVeigh, Terry Nichols and the Fortier brothers.

Or did you have something insane and ridiculous to add?

Explain Terry Yeakey's 'suicide'.

[UglyPug]

It's silly to act like conspiracies don't exist, or at least don't have some kind of truth behind them . . .

It's ******ed to believe a lot of conspiracies, though.

YOu gotta discriminate. . .

[Mike Tyson77]

Explain how come they never found the guy who shot 2Pac?

[subhuman]

Roswell, NM UFC incident

No way in hell was that a "weather balloon".

Government just doesn't want to admit that there are unidentified flying objects with non human species manning them.

There was also reports of thtrr dead alien bodies that were confiscated from the crash.

---

UFO FBI document release, 2011


Flying saucer memorandum.
In April 2011, the FBI posted a document from 1950 [108] on their website written by agent Guy Hottel which discussed a report forwarded by an investigator from the Air Force of three alien craft and their occupants having been recovered in New Mexico. The memo stated that "three so-called flying saucers" were recovered, each circular in shape with raised centers, each about 50 feet in diameter. Three occupants of "human shape," each about three feet tall, were found in each craft, and all were dressed "in metallic cloth of a very fine texture." The memo said that reports were "high-powered radar" had affected the alien crafts' control systems, causing them to crash. No date was mentioned, though the memo was date-stamped March 22, 1950, and no location more specific than "New Mexico" was mentioned. The memo stated that "no further evaluation was attempted" by the person who supplied the information.
Numerous sources connected the memo [109][110] to the Roswell UFO incident of 1947.

[arraamis]

The real question shouldn't be "Do you hate conspiracy theorist", it should be why is there such a campaign to downplay or invalidate ideas formulated outside of the normal "BOX" of common thinking.

For anyone to DENY the existence of so-called SECRET\ELITE GROUPS, that wield political influence, financial influence and influence in medicine and agriculture, would be completely foolish and naive. And it goes to a limited and narrow way of thinking, that only accounts for the forces or en****** that can be SEEN, not for the UNSEEN.

Its like acknowledging the existence of water because one can touch, see and feel it, while at the same time denying the existence of air, because it doesn't have attributes that can be validated by sensory perception.

Here's a thought: I've noticed a growing group of like-minded individuals, who almost treat any UNCOMMON thought or IDEA, that goes against the norm, as some type of conspiracy -- And those who foster these ideas, as Conspiracy Theorists.

If you look at the term: CONSPIRACY THEORY
a theory that explains an event or set of circumstances as the result of a secret plot by usually powerful conspirators.
{merriam-webster.com}

The terminology itself, doesn't eliminate the possibility that unseen powerful forces exist -- Only that events, are often attributed to, or the result of their actions.

***

Here's my take on the topic OF "CONSPIRACY THEORISTS" and those groups that constantly campaign against THEORIES formulated outside of the box.

What harm does it do, to have THEORIES?
Why is it necessary to challenge such THEORIES?

I was told once by one of my Professor's, that for twelve years of grade schooling and four additional years of college, we coupled with our chosen major, are being programmed how to RESPOND to AUTHORITY.

When we VIEW events and or CIRCUMSTANCES differently from the NORM, and formulate IDEAS that can be considered "Outside of the box" then it should be expected, that coming from those who have accepted the PROGRAMMING through and through, to be viewed as REBELS, CONSPIRATORS and the like. The goal is to physiologically embarrass and shame those individuals back inline with the COMMON WAY OF THINKING.

It is part of the programming that many have accepted willingly and for some unwillingly. So, whenever I witness someone constantly challenging any theory that can be considered abnormal, with mundane dialog and tangential arguments, I understand that this ACT is originating from someone who is PROGRAMMED to think a certain way, to FEEL a certain way and to INTERPRET events as prescribed without question.

As an example {maybe a poor one}: When G.W.Bush made his post 9/11 address to the nation, he stated that Conspiracy Theorists would not be tolerated. This was a signal to those PROGRAMMED, to go after everyone who formulated IDEAS, that went CONTRARY to the explanation that he offered. And to this day, we have a group of individuals, WHO ARE PART OF THE SYSTEM MENTALLY, that always RISE to challenge those who would think "Outside of the box" and suggest, that something was foul about 9/11.

Its all about the mental programming for those that are of the system and lack of programming for those that think outside of the box.

[Fury]

What does the Gulf of Tonkin have to do with this topic?

What does the Gulf of Tonkin incident have to do with a conspiracy thread? Just like 'Nayirah' and the baby incubators, It's proof the government lies to go to war.

Although... I guess you're right. They have no place in a conspiracy thread, as they are undeniable facts.

[Rossman]

Conspiracy Theorists need serious medication and adult supervision. Mental institutions are full of them. But a few slip through the cracks like roaches.

They are easily ignored unless they become violent or radical.

[Fury]

USS Liberty, Northwoods proposal.

[UglyPug]

USS Liberty, Northwoods proposal.

THERE'S ONLY OOOOOONNNNNEEE Sir Flabbers!!!

OOOOONNNNNNNNNNEEEEEEEEEEEE Sir Flabbers!

Walking along, singing a song, walkign in a flabbers wonderland. .

*Repeat 2x*