Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Does America "CHERRY PICK" their wars?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    North Korea would do the booty dew. 12 round UD, wide.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by Adamjr91 View Post
      Yea you're called a conspiracy nut for not taking everythings at face value

      North Korea having a crazy little dictator is in America's best interest. If North Korea weren't perceived as a threat, America would no longer have a reason to keep 30,000 troops on the Korean Peninsula.
      Anybody who takes any aspect of life at face value is stupid. Not trying to insult you by the way, your opinion is yours.

      Comment


      • #13
        U.S. still has it's "0" doe!

        Edit, seriously, there's no way to say the U.S. cherry picks its wars. The civil war was the bloodiest war in American history, and it was unavoidable. Al Haymon didn't exist back then.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by robust_ View Post
          U.S. still has it's "0" doe!

          Edit, seriously, there's no way to say the U.S. cherry picks its wars. The civil war was the bloodiest war in American history, and it was unavoidable. Al Haymon didn't exist back then.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by robust_ View Post
            U.S. still has it's "0" doe!

            Edit, seriously, there's no way to say the U.S. cherry picks its wars. The civil war was the bloodiest war in American history, and it was unavoidable. Al Haymon didn't exist back then.
            The UK should never have overlooked the US tune-up fight when we were thinking ahead to the cash-cow match up against India.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by robust_ View Post
              U.S. still has it's "0" doe!

              Edit, seriously, there's no way to say the U.S. cherry picks its wars. The civil war was the bloodiest war in American history, and it was unavoidable. Al Haymon didn't exist back then.
              Someone has to make a boxrec for national wars.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by Verstyle View Post
                Do we only fight wars that we know we can win and are low risk high reward? Because it seems we are openly ducking North Korea
                North Korea are less of a threat as they are than they would be if the US began a war of aggression against them. It would quickly spread into a wider conflict, not to mention decimate the northern part of South Korea.

                Originally posted by Beercules View Post
                War Bringer!

                Comment


                • #18
                  We'd murder those turds

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Well the US and its allies couldnt even defeat the taliban riding on donkies with AKs.

                    Im not sure how well we would go against countries with a proper military.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by robust_ View Post
                      U.S. still has it's "0" doe!

                      Edit, seriously, there's no way to say the U.S. cherry picks its wars. The civil war was the bloodiest war in American history, and it was unavoidable. Al Haymon didn't exist back then.
                      Didn't America lose it's 0 in Vietnam? and i could have sworn the Watson twins were present doing the Civil War..Al Haymon has a signature on the declaration of independance

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP