Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Miraculous Image of Our Lady of Guadalupe

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Miraculous Image of Our Lady of Guadalupe

    As a Mexican, one is raised celebrating and venerating "La Virgen de Guadalupe."

    I have a book that goes into detail into the story and mystery surrounding her appearance and miracles. The link below does a good job at touching at some of these points. Reading something like this can awaken one's faith. It's nice to imagine it's all real. Just thought I'd share.

    http://infallible-catholic.blogspot....r-lady-of.html

    The image of Our Lady of Guadalupe has been the subject of numerous technical studies since 1751 and extensive scientific investigations in recent years, and none of the result offered any sound scientific explanation which, up to this very day, defies science and all human reasoning as it continuous to baffle scientists and even skeptics.



    BULLET POINTS:



    *The "Tilma" (a kind of cloak worn by native Mexicans) of Juan Diego that bears the miraculous Image of Our Lady of Guadalupe is a coarse fabric made from the threads of the maguey cactus fiber which usually lasts no more than 20 to 30 years, and yet the fabric has maintained its structural integrity - without cracking or fading, or any sign of deterioration for nearly 500 years.

    *There is no explanation offered by NASA scientists on how the image was imprinted on the Tilma. There are no brush strokes, or sketch marks on it. The image also seems to increase in size and change colors owing to an unknown property of the surface and substance of which it is made.

    *The colors actually float above the surface of the Tilma at a distance of 3/10th of a millimeter (1/100th of an inch), without touching it. When examined less than 10 inches of the image, one can only see the maguey cloth; the colors totally disappear.

    *...No explanation was also offered by scientists as to why the Tilma is repellent to insects and dust.

    *In 1936, biochemist Richard Kuhn, a Nobel Prize winner in chemistry, analyzed a sample of the fabric and ascertained that the pigments used were from no known source; whether natural, animal, mineral, or vegetable.

    *After filtering and processing the digitized images to eliminate "noise" and enhance them, they discovered that portions of the face, hands, robe, and mantle had been painted in one step, with no sketches, or corrections, and no visible brush strokes or sizing used to render the surface smooth, no protective varnish covering the image to protect its surface. The Image changes in color slightly according to the angle of viewing, a phenomenon known as "Iridescence", a technique that cannot be reproduced with human hands.

    *Scientists were unable to find any trace of paint residue or dye of any sort on the Image and yet the the colors maintain their luminosity and brilliance

    *What produced the colors on Juan Diego's cloak or how they were applied remains a total mystery of science.

    *The bluish-green color of Our Lady's mantle is unique. It seems to be made of an unearthly shade that as yet no artist has been able exactly to duplicate.

    *On December 22, 1981, at the Observatory Laplace Mexico City, Father Mario Rojas and Dr. Juan Hernández Illescas, a medical doctor and amateur astronomer, performed an astronomical study of the Image and analyzed the stellar arrangement that appear in the Mantle of Our Lady. They surprisingly discovered that the stars stunningly and accurately map out the various constellations of the Mexican sky. Even more remarkable is the "star map" on the mantle is in the reverse (the cardinal axis rotated 90 degrees counterclockwise): providing a view of the constellations from beyond them, as would be seen looking through them towards the earth. The constellations are consistent with what astronomers believe was in the sky above Mexico City on the day the apparition occurred - in the winter-morning solstice of December 12, 1531, Saturday, at 10:26AM.



    *It has also been found that by imposing a topographical map of central Mexico on the Our Lady's dress, the mountains, rivers, and principal lakes coincide with the decoration on the dress.

    *According to the specialists of Kodak Corporation in Mexico, the Image is smooth and bears more resemblance to a color photograph than anything else. The Image has consistently defied exact reproduction, whether by brush or camera.

    *Callahan and Smith further discovered that the Tilma maintains a constant temperature of 36.6º to 37º, (98.6 Fahrenheit) the same as the body of a living person.

    *...all the optical imaging qualities of a normal human eye, such as light reflection, image positioning, and distortion on the cornea which are impossible to obtain on a flat surface. When the eye of Our Lady is exposed to light, the retina contracts, and when the light is withdrawn, it returns to a dilated state, just as happens with a living eye.

    *In 1991, an analysis made by outstanding ophthalmologists, identified normal microscopic network of veins and artery circulation in the free edge of Our Lady's eyelids and the cornea. According to the ophthalmologists who examined the eyes, no painter would have been able to humanly reproduce such precise microscopic details.

    *.....In summary, the Our Lady's eyes bear a kind of instant picture of what actually occurred at the moment the image was unveiled in front of the bishop and other witnesses on December 9, 1531.

    *A stethoscope was placed below the black band at the waist of Our Lady (a sign that she is pregnant) and heard rhythmic repeating heartbeats at 115 beats per minute, the same as that of a baby in the maternal womb.

    *In 1789, Dr. José Ignácio Bartolache had two copies of the image painted on an identical piece of maguey cloth using the best techniques of that time and placed them in the same salty and humid environment around the Basilica. After several decades, the two replicas disintegrated.

    *An attempt to "embellish" the Tilma was made which also proved futile: a crown was painted on Our Lady’s head and angels in the clouds. However, unlike the Tilma, these additions have faded away and are no longer visible.

    *In August 7, 2009, researcher and physicist Dr. Aldofo Orozco told participants...no scientific explanation for the 478 years of high quality-preservation of the Tilma, or for the miracles of its preservation.

    *One of the most bizarre characteristics of the cloth is that the back side is rough and coarse, but the front side is as soft as the most pure silk

    *An analysis of the fibers in 1946 concluded that the fibers came from the Agave plant, however, researchers could not figure out which of the 175 Agave species the Tilma was made from.

    *On November 14, 1921, a bomb with 29 sticks of dynamite was planted by Luciano Perez, a Spanish anarchist, in a flower arrangement on the altar under the Tilma which exploded and broke the marble altar rail, the marble floor and widows 150 meters from the explosion, but unexpectedly, neither the Tilma nor the normal glass that protected the image was damaged or broken. The only damage near the Tilma was a heavy brass crucifix twisted by the blast.

  • #2
    you should change your thread title to 'Atheists Please Attack Me Now'

    Comment


    • #3
      'Miraculous' or as it is otherwise known: Bullshit.

      Comment


      • #4

        Comment


        • #5
          "She also smoked a blunt"

          Comment


          • #6
            Why do mexicans worship her more than Jesus when in the ten commandments it prohibits it? Also, a lot of mexicans seem to think that Mary was mexican....dont they know she was Jewish? SMH

            Comment


            • #7
              chapo guzman > lady guadalupe

              smdh at extensive scientific investigations.....

              grow the hell up.

              Comment


              • #8
                a lot of skeptics and nay sayers calling bs with nothing to back it up?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Davis40 View Post
                  a lot of skeptics and nay sayers calling bs with nothing to back it up?
                  You have the whole burden of proof thing backwards

                  Prove that the invisible rainbow unicorn doesnt control our minds, because otherwise its true

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Freedom2014
                    If it gives some people comfort to believe in The Virgin Mary and the Miraculous Image of Our Lady of Guadalupe, then it's all good.


                    agreed..if it brings them some positivity in their lives and they're not hurting anyone, then what's the big deal?

                    it's the life they enjoy


                    this lounge gets me sometimes...there are those that will argue with all their hearts for ****s and these SAME rights but then turn around and put down the religious folk in the next thread

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP