Does Marquez deserve to lose his PFP No.2 spot?

[ny123]

true he was going up in weight but he didnt even win one round if he at least put up a good fight and won a couple rounds i would say no but he was dominated so thoroughly i would say yes **** even hatton took a couple rounds from mayweather. his pound for pound spot is based off the 2 fights with pac another guy who will be exposed soon and juan diaz who malignaggi already proved was overated jmm is a great lw so i think he should still be at the top of his divisional rankings but being the top lw in that weak division hardly qualifies you to be p4p #2 in the world

[JM1]

no. its quite moronic to put floyd in #2 after beating a small lightweight who moved up to welter looking fat, weak and slow

[AntonTheMeh]

with the most recent farce that the gbp owned ring magazine just pulled with ranking shane higher than he was but virtue of beating a plasterless fraud, i think it safe to say, the ring magazine has just been corrupted like the rest of the alphabet soup belts.
F U C K
floyd for not making 144.
F U C K
oscar that cross dressing british cigarette.
F U C K
that juicing punch drunk pug shame measley
and F U C K
that neanderathal gimp bernard hopkins.

watching this whole scenario unravel is pissing me off.on top of those *******s taking advantage of a legend like jmm, now they're manipulating ranking in order to force fights.I'm an even bigger fan of jmm now than i was before because of there bitchassness.

its one thing to be game, which jmm is/was, a man with courage and cojones, its should totally different story, and down right offensive as a fan to think idly about this whole situation, and let these dicks ruining boxing, whilst ****ting on a legend like jmm.

if cotto beats pac, would he supplant pac as number 1 p4p? no.
f u c k gbp, and f u c k ring magazine.

[Pullcounter]

jmm is still p4p #2 imho... floyd had the deck stacked against jmm.