well you could argue the pac man jmm fights anyway you want either fighter cant say same pac bradley. just crazy that jmm didnt have one victory before the ko, if he would of even gotten even 1 decision in the first 3 fights i would have more faith in the other decisions. but bradley pac is your answer not worth even arguing. fact that all the fights in question had pac man in em make you wonder if in every fight bob arum had judges in pocket and thats not meant to be a troll statement.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Which one is the real robbery..Pac vs JMM 1,2,3 or Pac vs Bradley?
Collapse
-
-
While Marquez deserved at least one of the first 3, there is an argument either way in all three fights. There's no real argument either way with Pac-Bradley, Pac got flat out robbed.
Comment
-
-
technically....there were no robberies imo. if you want to label one a robbery i'd go with pac/jmm 1 in favor of jmm. He dominated pac after the 1st round. yeah he landed some nice shots here and there but jmm thoroughly outclassed the overaggressive pac
the rest were very close but i felt pac barely lost all of them with the bradley fight being the best candidate to say pac won. bradley's defense and bodywork has ridiculously ignored. pac was credited with so many deflected and rolled punches it wasn't funny
had bradley thrown his punches properly as opposed to looping slaps then maybe people stop being so dismissive of what he accomplished. rewatch the fight without the hbo nuthugging and you'll see what i mean
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojangles1987 View PostWhile Marquez deserved at least one of the first 3, there is an argument either way in all three fights. There's no real argument either way with Pac-Bradley, Pac got flat out robbed.
Comment
Comment