Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Arum Trying To Force Cotto To Accept A Catchweight Or Go H2H

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by Mr. Fantastic View Post
    Cotto stans on catchweights


    Vs Pac: Damn catchweight waaaa waaaa waaaa

    Vs Margarito: 150 is a fair weight. War Catchweight Cotto!!!!

    vs Pac at 150 cw: ***** move!!


    You're pathetic ass motherfuckers!!!!

    Cotto tried to make a fight at 150 vs Margarito. I hate cw fights but if you truly hate em, you should hate them all even if your favorite boxer does the bitch move.

    Before you question me here goes.........

    Canelo BITCH MOVE for having cw fights at 150.

    Oscar BITCH MOVE vs the midget killer Hopkins at 156.
    What weight did Cotto and Margarito fight at?

    Comment


    • #22
      lol mr fantastic dropping truth bombs on cotto fan club

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by pacnpbfsuck View Post
        what weight did cotto and margarito fight at?
        one five three!!! Catch weight!!!

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by Mr. Fantastic View Post
          one five three!!! Catch weight!!!
          So why do you keep saying 150, when the catch weight was 153?

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by PACnPBFsuck View Post
            So why do you keep saying 150, when the catch weight was 153?
            Cause he TRIED?!?!

            Comment


            • #26
              Cotto vs Nelo, baby!
              Thats where the mula is at. Cotto should tell greedy Arum to phuck off! No more catchweights!!!!!

              Comment


              • #27
                Cotto been around too long to be falling for any of Arums bullsh$t

                Comment


                • #28
                  Cotto vs Canelo should have the green light. Better fight than anything Pac can do rather than a May fight.

                  If I was Hbo I would take Cotto vs Canelo.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    On the topic of catchweights, I don't have a problem with them just so long as belt aren't involved. If you're looking to put yourself in the history books then fight at the actual limit.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by FeFist View Post
                      On the topic of catchweights, I don't have a problem with them just so long as belt aren't involved. If you're looking to put yourself in the history books then fight at the actual limit.
                      This is a sane policy. But you'll find that most of the time, if there's a belt to be had, it's on the line for a CW fight. Heck, sometimes there is no belt, but the sanctioning body will cook one up for a CW (Pac Marg, Canelo Hatton, Mares Morel)

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP