USA Today - Froch vs. Dirrell: 117-110

[SugarSugar]

117-110 is ridiculous imo. So that's 118-110 without the point off. I'm sorry but there were tons of close rounds mid fight, cant believe they could get it that wide

[Benncollinsaad]

These newspaper "experts" are the worst. They have absolutely no objectivity in them.

[Sαntα]

Froch vs Dirrell full fight here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AoEEPoBwf7Y

[DC Fight Fan]

All you really need to ask yourself is

How many effective punches did Froch land?

[Sαntα]

All you really need to ask yourself is

How many effective punches did Froch land?

Enough to bust up Dirrell's face.

[Walterson]

Froch vs Dirrell full fight here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AoEEPoBwf7Y

Rocky caught it in the end though, Froch was just confused.

[swizz]

BBC scored it for Dirrell

SkySports scored it for Dirrelll

The UK knows who won!

are you for real? i was stunt last nite and then the froch interview

[Check]

Froch won 2 rounds on my card. You could have given him a few rounds that were close but there isn't any way you could of given him more than 4.

[swizz]

Enough to bust up Dirrell's face.

you call the busting up your as cocky as your fighter who is below average skills are very tell if he would be a u.s fighter he would not be undefeated

[DC Fight Fan]

Enough to bust up Dirrell's face.

You really think Froch "busted up" Dirrell's face?

What fight were you watching?


Honestly, I think Dirrell probably won at least 8 rounds if not 10. But what dissappointed me the most is that he could have won all the rounds if not even stopped Froch. This he proved after the point deduction when he appeared to get mad and sit down on his punches more. He was powerful accurate and fast as lightening after the point deduction. If he would fight like this 100% of the time he would have stopped Froch rather easily IMO.