Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

In their last 5 wins; Who has the worst and best resume in The Ring top 10 P4P?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    People only like Brian Kenny when he bashes a certain fighter.

    Comment


    • #22


      1 Barry Tompkins Showtime 119-110 Pacquiao
      2 Harold Lederman HBO 119-109 Pacquiao
      3 Ray Markarian The Sweet Science 119-109 Pacquiao
      4 Michael Marley Examiner 119-109 Pacquiao
      5 Dan Rafael ESPN 119-109 Pacquiao
      6 Vittorio Tafur San Francisco Chronicle 119-109 Pacquiao
      7 Michael Woods The Sweet Science 119-109 Pacquiao
      8 Ramon Aranda 3 More Rounds 118-110 Pacquiao
      9 Mario Cabrera Boxing Republic 118-110 Pacquiao
      10 Nigel Collins ESPN 118-110 Pacquiao
      11 Mike Coppinger Ring Magazine 118-110 Pacquiao
      12 Ace Freeman Fight Fan 118-110 Pacquiao
      13 Rich Marotta KFI Los Angeles 118-110 Pacquiao
      14 Kelsey McCarson The Sweet Science 118-110 Pacquiao
      15 Gabriel Montoya MaxBoxing 118-110 Pacquiao
      16 Pete O’Brien USA Today 118-110 Pacquiao
      17 Eric Raskin Grantland 118-110 Pacquiao
      18 Michael Rosenthal Ring Magazine 118-110 Pacquiao
      19 Colin Seymour Examiner 118-110 Pacquiao
      20 Ryan ******** Ring Magazine 118-110 Pacquiao
      21 Gary Andrew Poole TIME 118-110 Pacquiao
      22 Ryan Burton Boxing Scene 117-111 Pacquiao
      23 Scott Christ Bad Left Hook 117-111 Pacquiao
      24 Tim Dahlberg Associated Press 117-111 Pacquiao
      25 Gareth Davies London Daily Telegraph 117-111 Pacquiao
      26 Doug Fischer Ring Magazine 117-111 Pacquiao
      27 David Greisman Boxing Scene 117-111 Pacquiao
      28 Jorge Hernandez The Low Blow 117-111 Pacquiao
      29 Kevin Iole Yahoo! Sports 117-111 Pacquiao
      30 Robert Littal Black Sports Online 117-111 Pacquiao
      31 Steve Kim Max Boxing 117-111 Pacquiao
      32 Ryan Maquiñana Comcast SportsNet Bay Area 117-111 Pacquiao
      33 David Mayo MLive 117-111 Pacquiao
      34 Kieran Mulvaney HBO 117-111 Pacquiao
      35 Lance Pugmire Los Angeles Times 117-111 Pacquiao
      36 Chris Robinson Boxing Scene 117-111 Pacquiao
      37 Nick Xouris Fight Hype 118-111 Pacquiao
      38 Champ Ross Da Truth Boxing 117-111 Pacquiao
      39 Luis Sandoval Boxing Scene 117-111 Pacquiao
      40 Jonathan Sakti Comcast SportsNet Bay Area 117-111 Pacquiao
      41 Tim Starks Queensberry Rules 117-111 Pacquiao
      42 Richie Tomassini Comcast SportsNet Bay Area 117-111 Pacquiao
      43 Darren Velasco 8 Count News 117-111 Pacquiao
      44 Rick Reeno Boxing Scene 116-112 Pacquiao
      45 George Willis New York Post 116-112 Pacquiao
      46 Steve Zemach Queensberry Rules 116-112 Pacquiao
      47 Salmaan Ahmed[not in citation given] Fight Today UK 116-112 Pacquiao
      48 Armando Alvarez Telemundo 115-113 Pacquiao
      49 Jake Donovan Boxing Scene 115-113 Pacquiao
      50 Lem Satterfield Ring Magazine 115-113 Pacquiao
      51 J.C. Casarez Boxeo Mundial 115-113 Pacquiao
      52 Thomas Hauser HBO 115-114 Bradley
      53 Bart Barry HBO 116-115 Bradley
      54 Brian Kenny Top Rank 116-112 Bradley
      55 Springs Toledo[12] The Sweet Science 117-112 Pacquiao
      56 Michael Galvin[not in citation given] RAF 116-112 Pacquiao
      57 Aleksander Nazarov[not in citation given] Boxing Scene 118-110 Pacquiao
      58 Cliff Rold Boxing Scene 117-111 Pacquiao

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by -Kev- View Post
        It was close. Very few people say it was close, but in the end it was close.
        why do you think so many people felt it was a robbery?

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by -SWIFT- View Post
          why do you think so many people felt it was a robbery?
          HBO biased commentary, no replay shown of any of Bradley's 108 punches landed, i'm serious, go check, no replay of anything that Bradley did. Also, no credit given to Bradley limiting a usually active Pacquiao, to under 500 punches thrown. I also think compubox was rigged for that fight to favor Pacquiao. Pacquiao didn't land no 190 punches in that fight.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by -Kev- View Post
            HBO biased commentary, no replay shown of any of Bradley's 108 punches landed. Also, no credit given to Bradley limiting a usually active Pacquiao, to under 500 punches thrown. I also think compubox was rigged for that fight to favor Pacquiao. Pacquiao didn't land no 190 punches in that fight.


            Once again, new boxing fans are pure experts on making actual fans laugh.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by Hidden View Post


              Once again, new boxing fans are pure experts on making actual fans laugh.


              typical racist, hurr durr i hate filipino fighters they suck hurr gotta roll wit the brothas else ima tom
              You wasted your cheap ass red k to say that?

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by -Kev- View Post
                HBO biased commentary, no replay shown of any of Bradley's 108 punches landed, i'm serious, go check, no replay of anything that Bradley did. Also, no credit given to Bradley limiting a usually active Pacquiao, to under 500 punches thrown. I also think compubox was rigged for that fight to favor Pacquiao. Pacquiao didn't land no 190 punches in that fight.
                lol i feel the same damn way i couldnt even enjoy the fight the first time around with jim lampleys cheerleading

                Comment


                • #28
                  Red k'ing me with his 99 cents store karma

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Sorry but that's sigworthy. New boxing fans

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by -Kev- View Post




                      You wasted your cheap ass red k to say that?
                      lol dude called you racist then made fun of the way black people talk what an idiot

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP