Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Planet could be 'unrecognizable' by 2050, experts say

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Planet could be 'unrecognizable' by 2050, experts say

    Planet could be 'unrecognizable' by 2050, experts say


    WASHINGTON (AFP) – A growing, more affluent population competing for ever scarcer resources could make for an "unrecognizable" world by 2050, researchers warned at a major US science conference Sunday.

    The United Nations has predicted the global population will reach seven billion this year, and climb to nine billion by 2050, "with almost all of the growth occurring in poor countries, particularly Africa and South Asia," said John Bongaarts of the non-profit Population Council.

    To feed all those mouths, "we will need to produce as much food in the next 40 years as we have in the last 8,000," said Jason Clay of the World Wildlife Fund at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).

    "By 2050 we will not have a planet left that is recognizable" if current trends continue, Clay said.

    The swelling population will exacerbate problems, such as resource depletion, said John Casterline, director of the Initiative in Population Research at Ohio State University.

    But incomes are also expected to rise over the next 40 years -- tripling globally and quintupling in developing nations -- and add more strain to global food supplies.

    People tend to move up the food chain as their incomes rise, consuming more meat than they might have when they made less money, the experts said.

    It takes around seven pounds (3.4 kilograms) of grain to produce a pound of meat, and around three to four pounds of grain to produce a pound of cheese or eggs, experts told AFP.

    "More people, more money, more consumption, but the same planet," Clay told AFP, urging scientists and governments to start making changes now to how food is produced.

    Population experts, meanwhile, called for more funding for family planning programs to help control the growth in the number of humans, especially in developing nations.

    "For 20 years, there's been very little investment in family planning, but there's a return of interest now, partly because of the environmental factors like global warming and food prices," said Bongaarts.

    "We want to minimize population growth, and the only viable way to do that is through more effective family planning," said Casterline.

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20110220...populationfood

  • #2
    Imma be like 59 lol, thats if I live that long. lol

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by *Khan View Post
      Imma be like 59 lol, thats if I live that long. lol

      Nobody cares how long you live.

      What we care is that you respond after having read the actual article posted, which is the topic of this thread.

      If you can't do that, why bother replying?

      Comment


      • #4
        To feed all those mouths, "we will need to produce as much food in the next 40 years as we have in the last 8,000"

        This is the sort of statement designed to goad the uneducated. Populations have been quite consistently small throughout history until the past 200 years, so even if this figure is accurate, it's really not a hyperbolic amount. In the US the government pays farmers NOT to grow crops
        Last edited by Miburo; 02-21-2011, 01:13 AM.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by cupocity303 View Post

          Nobody cares how long you live.

          What we care is that you respond after having read the actual article posted, which is the topic of this thread.

          If you can't do that, why bother replying?
          Lol, I actually thought that was funny.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Tengoshi View Post
            To feed all those mouths, "we will need to produce as much food in the next 40 years as we have in the last 8,000"

            This is the sort of statement designed to goad the uneducated. Populations have been quite consistently small throughout history until the past 200 years, so even if this figure is accurate, it's really not a hyperbolic amount. In the US the government pays farmers NOT to grow crops
            Care to expend on this post a little further?

            Comment


            • #7
              its just a measure to keep everything in check, do not be alarmed, this is just a drill, it could happen, or not, sounds like bull***** to me lol

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by *Khan View Post
                Lol, I actually thought that was funny.
                its not funny gtfo idiot!!!!!!!!!!!

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Tengoshi View Post
                  To feed all those mouths, "we will need to produce as much food in the next 40 years as we have in the last 8,000"

                  This is the sort of statement designed to goad the uneducated. Populations have been quite consistently small throughout history until the past 200 years, so even if this figure is accurate, it's really not a hyperbolic amount. In the US the government pays farmers NOT to grow crops
                  It's true, the invention of synthetic fertilizer has meant that we can produce food at unprecedented levels so going back to the mostly agrarian societies that existed prior to the industrial revolution is a deliberately misleading statement.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    By then the environment will be so messed up anyways.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP