Originally posted by Roy Hobbs
View Post
You use the most moronic logic ever to justify why Pacquaio has a better resume than Whitaker and then when it's used to compare another set of fighters to break down why it's stupid, you just repeat the same thing and it some how doesn't apply for them.
It can't apply for one and not the other.
I've already stated why Whitaker's resume is better. First and foremost, he his win over Chavez is better than anything Pacquaio has done.
Let me guess, your reply will be; "Well that's not a win, that's technically a draw" whilst crushing the relevance of that by clearly stating yourself that it was a robbery.
His win over Azumah Nelson is also better than anything Pacquaio has done in his career.
All you've stated to your claim is a long list of things where Pacquaio has the advantage of Whitaker.
Well, like I have already stated, you can do the exact same thing with a long list of fighters who are greater than Pacquaio. Let me guess, the same doesn't apply? Only when it's Whitaker for some reason.
Comment