Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Golovkin has higher standards than any other fighter among fans

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by The Gambler1981 View Post
    Not objective because I didn't bring up any of that, Floyd is better than most men that fought and many of them retired before their late 30's.

    Floyd did his thing and that can be judged, he doesn't have to prove anything.

    Your opinion that he has to do something makes you not objective~
    Ofcourse it does when you call yourself TBE.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Mr. Objectivity View Post
      Ofcourse it does when you call yourself TBE.
      So what? He can claim whatever he wants, if he wants to comeback and try some stuff alright but that is a choice of his to make.

      Like when Team Golovkin says things like I will fight anyman from 154 to 168~ should he not then follow through on those boast. Or are those just meaningless as well?

      Not looking real objectively at it.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by The Gambler1981 View Post
        So what? He can claim whatever he wants, if he wants to comeback and try some stuff alright but that is a choice of his to make.

        Like when Team Golovkin says things like I will fight anyman from 154 to 168~ should he not then follow through on those boast. Or are those just meaningless as well?

        Not looking real objectively at it.
        Just objectively stating facts he isnt such.
        he isn t even top 20.
        Thats what im saying he isnt trying to be great or TBE

        TBE!!! TBE!!! TBE!!! doe

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Mr. Objectivity View Post
          Just objectively stating facts he isnt such.
          he isn t even top 20.
          Thats what im saying he isnt trying to be great or TBE

          TBE!!! TBE!!! TBE!!! doe
          Maybe or maybe not that is an opinion based question, how do you rate someone against history is there some set criteria or is everyone a bit different on that.

          To me greatness is a qualitative question not a quantitative one.

          Objectively speaking

          Comment


          • Originally posted by just the facts View Post
            if you truly are Mr Objective, this post makes you misinformed or stupid. Which is it?
            Are we strictly speaking of "just the facts" or the opinions as well?

            Comment


            • Originally posted by The Gambler1981 View Post
              Maybe or maybe not that is an opinion based question, how do you rate someone against history is there some set criteria or is everyone a bit different on that.

              To me greatness is a qualitative question not a quantitative one.

              Objectively speaking
              criteria : fighting prime ATG/HOF fighters is one.
              dominating prime ATG/HOF fighters of you era.
              Dominating at the biggest stage, when the world is
              watching. (Ali vs foreman).



              He is not even NEAR the TBE/GOAT qualitative or quantitative that is a FACT not an opinion.

              Objectively speaking.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Mr. Objectivity View Post
                criteria : fighting prime ATG/HOF fighters is one.
                dominating prime ATG/HOF fighters of you era.
                Dominating at the biggest stage, when the world is
                watching. (Ali vs foreman).



                He is not even NEAR the TBE/GOAT qualitative or quantitative that is a FACT not an opinion.

                Objectively speaking.
                Those criteria are full of opinions, which means they can't be factual.

                Which makes it impossible to be objective, especially when you are highly driven by strong opinions like yourself. Which would subjectivity~

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Mr. Objectivity View Post
                  criteria : fighting prime ATG/HOF fighters is one.
                  dominating prime ATG/HOF fighters of you era.
                  Dominating at the biggest stage, when the world is
                  watching. (Ali vs foreman).



                  He is not even NEAR the TBE/GOAT qualitative or quantitative that is a FACT not an opinion.

                  Objectively speaking.
                  Floyd never stepped in once with a Prime ATG at their best weight class. Usually he has the size and reach advantage.

                  All of the other greats had 1 A level prime fighter in their resume. Floyd never did once. It's the basis of the undefeated record that alludes the people into the illusion that Floyd is unbeatable. Max Kellerman was perfect on what Floyd's career was.

                  "Floyd was TBE, not because he is the best in the ring but outside of it, in the political regime of boxing. He fights the fighters with the highest reward at their Lowest risk, and get praised by it."

                  Comment


                  • GGG fanboys hate him so much. They just don't want him to be great. Shocking really.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by larry x.. View Post
                      I literally never mention the guy nor that fight period
                      You have been banned under a dozen different names, you have mentioned Marquez as being a great floyd win specifically saying "because Marquez is a top pound for pound fighter".

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP