Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Should gays be allowed to adopt children?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Weltschmerz View Post
    You're not the brightest person in the room, even if you pretend so.
    I don't need to be the brightest person in the room, as long as my arguments are the best.

    Originally posted by Weltschmerz
    @ squalpiggy.

    You don't ever mention my son again. I'm going to slaughter you in case.
    What precisely did I say about your son that you believe warrants making a death threat?

    Apart from that his dad is a bigot.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Freedom2014
      Gay couple sexually abuse adopted Russian boy, make videos

      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...loitation.html




      Gay couple abuse 9-year-old adopted son

      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/1...n_4466062.html

      Adopted girl says mother forced her to dig her own grave

      http://www.nbcnews.com/news/investig...rave-v20389254

      Doctors abused adopted children
      Middle-class doctors were left free to abuse adopted children in a "reign of terror" because social workers were intimidated by their professional status, a review has found.

      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...-children.html

      We can always find examples of children being abused by adoptive parents.

      Also your second example the victim was the natural son of one of the partners and was not adopted.
      Last edited by squealpiggy; 02-10-2014, 06:25 PM.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Weltschmerz View Post
        You fail to comprehend the simplicity and beauty of a mother, father, and a child. You want to hold these values, pervert them and in the name of political correctness, suit them to your perverse agenda. Family life is not absurd pornography.
        Its not about political correctness, its reason and common sense.
        What values are being perverted? That a child isnt raised by one female and one male? What about single parents? Or a child raised by an aunt or grandparent?

        You think a child living with two same sex people who show affection will somehow corrupt the child?

        Originally posted by squealpiggy View Post

        What it really boils down to is that the people opposing same sex adoption think that sex acts between same sex couples are icky. That's it.
        Yep. After all that bs about morals and kids being made fun of it comes down to "gay sex is gross". Or 'perverse/****ogarphic' as he puts it.

        He thinks what he finds repulsive is automatically immoral and perverse.
        Straight couples have bum sex all the time. I knew a girl who sodomised her boyfriend with the handle of her hair brush for kicks. But they were a totally 'normal' couple.
        Many gay men dont ever have **** sex.

        It seems true that many anti-gay people reduce a gay person to a sex act they assume they engage in. Thats all they see.

        "Something something anuses"
        Awesomeness.



        :smileysex
        Last edited by The Noose; 02-11-2014, 06:50 AM.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Weltschmerz View Post
          With the failings—and bias—of gay-parenting studies, we have to conclude that we simply do not have sufficient scientific basis to condone gay adoption. We do have sufficient basis, however, to determine that gays are far too volatile and unstable as a group for society to justify risking the safety of its children.

          Consider the group’s significantly higher rates of suicidal tendency, promiscuity, pedophilia, and domestic violence. This does not even touch the possible negative impact children may suffer simply from having two parents of the same sex. Is society really willing to risk its fragile children for the sake of
          politics?

          What is being proposed by the gay lobby is not just another single-parent family or adoption situation, but an all-new family unit, consisting of a mother-and-mother with children or a father-and-father with children. This is something the likes of which the Judeo-Christian ethic has not heard, nor has the West, which rests on this ethic. The family is the building block of society. When the building block of society falls, society falls with it. What is under threat here is not simply the well-being of children—which is important enough—it is the fabric of Western society itself.

          A choice is set before us, that of sacrificing to the gods of political correctness, or of considering the most innocent and fragile members of our society.
          You copied and pasted that from an article by the Christian Research Institute.
          Yet you are a staunch anti-religious Atheist.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by The Noose View Post
            You copied and pasted that from an article by the Christian Research Institute.
            Yet you are a staunch anti-religious Atheist.

            He's an obvious troll, and not very good at it. He will argue for the sky being red, if everyone says it's blue.

            I got bored with him very quickly.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by The Noose View Post
              You copied and pasted that from an article by the Christian Research Institute.
              Yet you are a staunch anti-religious Atheist.

              The link is here.

              Comment


              • A child being in a home with two parents and incomes is a million, nay, zillion times better than just one, period.

                Comment

                Working...
                X
                TOP