Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Floyd ain't for Legacy only for money and easy, winnable fights.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Roman Moreno
    Maybe you should stop replying so your thread can die down. Just so you won't suffer the embarrassment of not knowing WTF you're talking about. Don't even speak about boxing. Just sit back and read and maybe you can learn something.
    ok wwe expert hehe! My wish is your command. I don't want to reply to someone who doesn't know what the 4 horsemen mean. Not knowing that is being a nooby hehe. Take it easy

    Comment


    • #32
      What an imbecile is this Spoon23

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Roman Moreno
        Well most elite fighters are like that.

        That is why Pac chose Margarito, Mosley, and even JMM. For an easy money not legacy that's for damn sure. However, the JMM bout bit him in the ass.
        Hi farking ******.
        If he didnt fight Margarito, Mosley , JMM.
        Tell me who is this farking mysterious boxer that Pacman should of fought?

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Roman Moreno
          Instead of Margarito there was Paul Williams, instead of Mosley there was Andre Berto, instead of a Lightweight that supposedly "business is finished" remember that quote? anyways there was Ortiz.

          But, hey "farking"(I assume you mean fucking right?) ******. Those fights would have helped his legacy way more than the money fights he took which actually gave his legacy a hit more so than help.
          Hey dumbo didn't want to reply but this one cracks me up lol. Wow, Paul Williams fighting Pac. A 5'5" midget fighting a long reach 6 footer. That is a freek show worth watching lol

          Make sense wwe expert lol

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Spoon23 View Post
            First of all ask yourself, where is Floyd's legacy if he doesn't fight Pac?

            When was the last time in his career he fought a p4p ranked fighter during the time of fighting his opponent?

            Who can he be proud to say he beat a really tough guy during that time of fighting him? When?

            Lastly, the greats like Sugar Ray Leonard, Marvin Haggler, Roberto Duran, Hitman Hearns all fought each other to prove who is the best in the ring. Round robin. THEY WERE CALLED THE 4 HORSEMEN. (FLOYD SADLY HAS NONE TO SAY HE DID IT WITH)

            While in Pac's career he had what these Greats had. He was included in the 4 HORSEMEN OF TODAY

            These are the fight Pac fought Barrera 2x, Morales fought 3x, Marquez 3x Round robin they fought. These fighters when pac fought were in the p4p list at the time he fought them


            Pac has proven going up in his career he challenged the best there is. And now after beating the best the welterweight division has to offer there is only one person left and that is Floyd.




            That said,

            Floyd has said he doesn't fight for history means he ain't for legacy, he fights for money.

            Self preservation must comes first. He doesn't care about his fans or the haters he cares about his family he has to feed. He has to be careful who he fights.

            Floyd Mayweather, Jr. - "I'm in the game to win; not just inside the ring, but outside the ring, and my health is more important than anything."

            Bob Costas - "When you say 'your health', if the deal can be made financially, are you implying you have something to fear from Pacquiao."

            Quote: "Floyd mayweather fights for Floyd mayweather... Look at the Ali situation, if Ali could take it back.. He shouldn't have taken the fights the fans pushed him to (the ones he lost). Floyd Mayweather won't be pushed into fights he doesn't want ... Without Pacquiao, Floyd Mayweather is fine."


            The debate is over, floyd himself admits it. So clear.. Now we don't have to guess how Floyd thinks. It's about self preservation. He will only fight boxers he can surely win and obvious threats like Pac (the best fighter to fight) he should stay away from After all as Floyd said this is a deadly sport. self preservation is his priority doesn't have the care in the world for the glory of it the sport. How can a fan like that in a fighter??

            Self preservation, family comes first.. Being great fuvk it.. But He keeps on telling himself he is the greatest lol.. Nowhere near Ali. He ain't for legacy. No super bowl glory, no nba championship game winning shot. Just coasting to make easy winnable fights to rip of boxing fans who are gullible. Legit threats ain't in Floyd's agenda. Sad but true.. After all, It came out of the horse's mouth..
            you'd have loved prime roy jones

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Roman Moreno
              Being a nooby is thinking Barrera, Morales, JMM, and Pac are like the 4 horsemen. Morales-JMM none existent.

              Being nooby is thinking SRL, Duran, Hearns, and Hagler were the original 4 horsemen. As if that's the first time 4 great fighters have fought each other . Hell before SRL fought Hagler. The 4 horsemen of that era was SRL, Benitez, Hearns, and Duran.

              Don't make threads or any kind of post. Just read from other smart posters so you can learn about the sport.

              And, none of that had anything to do with Pac fighting for money and not legacy as well.
              Those you're laughing at our great mexican p4p fighters. If they (Barrera, Morales, Marquez, PAcquiao) were as big in size as the famous 4 horse men (SRL, Hearns, Haggler,Duran). Those 4 mentioned will give them a run for their money.

              Skill wise this will be an interesting match up. Disrespecting these mexican greats who poured blood sweat and tears to their craft have shown how good they are.

              pound for pound means regardless of weight. In theory if they are fighting in the same weight. That's what p4p means. And these guys I mentioned were in the 10 best p4p when pac fought them. And them fought their guts out.

              Hence, they were called the most recent 4 horsemen. Disrespecting these great fighters are just dumb.


              To close being a nooby is thinking the Four horsemen is part of WWE hehe!
              Last edited by Spoon23; 03-04-2012, 09:01 AM.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by trainhard_187 View Post
                Ten years from now boxing fans will be saying

                "Floyd never took advantage of the opportunity"
                Not necessarily ten years from now, but in 2 years or so boxing fans will be saying, "Remember the *******s? God they were awful."

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by DeadLikeMe View Post
                  Not necessarily ten years from now, but in 2 years or so boxing fans will be saying, "Remember the *******s? God they were awful."
                  Remember the *****s they are the dumbest fans in boxing they don't make sense. lol

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Remember the *******s they are the dumbest fans in boxing they don't make sense. lol

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by I'm so sorry View Post
                      Remember the *******s they are the dumbest fans in boxing they don't make sense. lol
                      Case in point. The number one ***** of them all lol

                      these floyd fanboys still don't get it.

                      floyd doesn't want this fight. he's afraid to get hurt and end up like ali.
                      what part of that don't you understand silly kids?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP