Pavlik is at the begining of his career and is only 26 years old with one title defense and yet you feel the need to question his resume?
Your ignorance is astounding considering Calzaghe beat a shot to pieces Eubank who had two fights left in him in which he lost both.At least Pavlik fought a prime fighter for his belt{Taylor}who beat a younger Hopkins than Calzaghe did twice.
Of course Pavlik will have a ****ty resume compared to Calzaghe who had over twenty defenses of his supermiddlweight belt.
That would be why is resume is questioned. Beat Miranda, OK, beat Taylor, good, beat Calzaghe....?
That would be why is resume is questioned. Beat Miranda, OK, beat Taylor, good, beat Calzaghe....?
As of now judging his resume to compare him with Calzaghe wouldn't be a wise thing to do considering there are no fighters on it to compare to Joe Calzaghe in skill level.
Calzaghe would beat Pavlik and I don't need to look at his resume to see that just his skilll sets.
Comment