Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Which one is the real robbery..Pac vs JMM 1,2,3 or Pac vs Bradley?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Which one is the real robbery..Pac vs JMM 1,2,3 or Pac vs Bradley?

    Just because Marquez made a t-shirt printed with words saying he won the 3 fights and cried hard to everybody automatically made him won the 3 fights but was robbed. Pac didn't cry to everybody when one of the judge screwed his score and admitted the scoring error he made in favor of Marquez. The second fight was clearly for Pacquiao and the 3rd can go either way but was far from a robbery in reality as Marquez and Pac haters tried to paint.

    Pac vs Bradley was the real definition of ROBBERY and Pac didn't shred a single tear about it let alone cried to everybody.

  • #2
    wth is this? there's a lot of threads about this already. and there's a lot more to talk about than this. this is simple understanding. only idiots complicate it.

    pac-marquez I-III can go either way. pac-bradley was a close fight, but it was pac's.. you could make a case for bradley if ur being too kind. and yes pac missed a lot but bradley didn't land anything significant either.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by boxer.exposed View Post
      Just because Marquez made a t-shirt printed with words saying he won the 3 fights and cried hard to everybody automatically made him won the 3 fights but was robbed. Pac didn't cry to everybody when one of the judge screwed his score and admitted the scoring error he made in favor of Marquez. The second fight was clearly for Pacquiao and the 3rd can go either way but was far from a robbery in reality as Marquez and Pac haters tried to paint.

      Pac vs Bradley was the real definition of ROBBERY and Pac didn't shred a single tear about it let alone cried to everybody.
      Pac shed lots of tears after the 4th fight

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by dibzvincent143 View Post
        wth is this? there's a lot of threads about this already. and there's a lot more to talk about than this. this is simple understanding. only idiots complicate it.

        pac-marquez I-III can go either way. pac-bradley was a close fight, but it was pac's.. you could make a case for bradley if ur being too kind. and yes pac missed a lot but bradley didn't land anything significant either.
        cute couple lol...

        Comment


        • #5
          The 3rd fight was a clear Marquez win in my eyes as was Pacquaio's 'win over Bradley though I think Bradley was more competitive than people like to give him credit for.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by boxer.exposed View Post
            Just because Marquez made a t-shirt printed with words saying he won the 3 fights and cried hard to everybody automatically made him won the 3 fights but was robbed. Pac didn't cry to everybody when one of the judge screwed his score and admitted the scoring error he made in favor of Marquez. The second fight was clearly for Pacquiao and the 3rd can go either way but was far from a robbery in reality as Marquez and Pac haters tried to paint.

            Pac vs Bradley was the real definition of ROBBERY and Pac didn't shred a single tear about it let alone cried to everybody.
            He's wearing a T shirt right that says "The Judges can't save you now"
            oh btw Mercito Gesta Fo Life Fool! He'll bounce back just you wait!
            Last edited by Garofalo; 12-20-2012, 01:16 AM.

            Comment


            • #7
              youre dumb as **** to even ask this sht1 ..pac vs jmm 1,2,3 were close fights while the pac vs bradley was not ....

              Comment


              • #8
                Pac vs bradley was a one sided beat down.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by boxer.exposed View Post
                  Just because Marquez made a t-shirt printed with words saying he won the 3 fights and cried hard to everybody automatically made him won the 3 fights but was robbed. Pac didn't cry to everybody when one of the judge screwed his score and admitted the scoring error he made in favor of Marquez. The second fight was clearly for Pacquiao and the 3rd can go either way but was far from a robbery in reality as Marquez and Pac haters tried to paint.

                  Pac vs Bradley was the real definition of ROBBERY and Pac didn't shred a single tear about it let alone cried to everybody.
                  Speak for yourself, The majority of everyone who scored that fight scored it for Marquez. So don't give us this "Clear victory for Pacquiao" bullsh##.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Ring Magazine had a poll and the results showed that Marquez Pacquiao 3 was indeed a robbery so........ yah

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP