Who has the better Resume? Julio Cesar Chavez or Hector Camacho Sr.?

[dondi330]

I know they were different types of fighters and I know that Chavez beat Camacho.
The question is who had a more impressive record.

Hector Camacho Sr.
http://www.boxrec.com/list_bouts.php...=607&cat=boxer
Some names:

Ray Mancini
Roberto Duran
Felix Trinidad
Sugar Ray Leonard
Edwin Rosario
Oscar De La Hoya
Vinny Pazienza
Julio Cesar Chavez


Julio Cesar Chavez
http://www.boxrec.com/list_bouts.php...8119&cat=boxer

Some names:

Pernell Whitaker
Oscar De La Hoya
Meldrick Taylor
Juan Laporte
Miguel Angel Gonzales
Kostya Tszyu
Hector Camacho Sr.
Edwin Rosario

[krispy kreme]

I'd say Camacho.

[IMDAZED]

Chavez...EASY.

Do some of you realize a resume means who you beat...not fought?

[krispy kreme]

Chavez...EASY.

Do some of you realize a resume means who you beat...not fought?

I just assumed he meant who each guy fought.

[IMDAZED]

I just assumed he meant who each guy fought.

I hope that's not what he meant. What would be the point?

[krispy kreme]

I hope that's not what he meant. What would be the point?

I'm not sure.

[Bushbaby]

If u mean on overall performance Camacho feared better!!

[dde91]

Chavez by a distance.

[dondi330]

I just assumed he meant who each guy fought.

Yes ...just meant who he fought....Winning a fight can easily be challenged by us fans (but don't want to get into that)...Chavez with Whitaker and Meldrick Taylor Etc....Camacho with Rosario and Duran.....Some fans can say the other guys won too...Face it if you guys followed both of their careers....They both had some controversial wins (like I said dont want to get into that). Also a "resume" Does not necessarily mean who they beat....a resume shows your experience.

[DarchinyFAN]

Chavez...EASY.

Do some of you realize a resume means who you beat...not fought?

Exactly...... Camacho wasnt close to beating De La Hoya, Trinidad, or Chavez.

Leonard was on his 3rd comeback

Duran was 46 and 50 y/o respectively in their fights.

Mancini was coming off 4 years of inactivity.