Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why do people act like Marquez Completely dominated Pacquiao in the first fight?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    When I watched it live I scored it a draw and everytime I score it I score it a draw.

    A draw is a fair result.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by La Zorrita View Post
      donaire scored the 2nd bout and had JMM winning

      JMM beat pugqiao twice
      I would bet on Humberto Sotto againts Rios and JMM.


      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
        Maybe I slightly exaggerated.

        But alot of the time Ledermans card's are woeful.

        I remember him scoring Round 1 in Mayweather-Chavez to Chavez eve though Chavez landed like under 5 punches and Mayweather landed if not 20 almost 20.
        Another example of him favoring aggression.

        Comment


        • #24
          most boxing experts had marquez winning both...since when are kds considered a factor when the fighter comes back and wins almost every other round.and the second fight just proves how retarted judges really are nowadays

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by AllEyesOpen View Post
            Why cause i don't reach your conclusion, I love this fight and have watched it often, to be honest it sounds like you who aren't watching this fight objectively.
            You said way back right?

            Watch it round by round and score it objectively.

            i already told you the rounds why dont you check it out mate.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by La Zorrita View Post
              lol pugqiao lost almost all rounds except 1... delusional pacfart.


              WTF piss drinker lost..


              Delusional peedrinkingtard..

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by TuRoK'em View Post
                most boxing experts had marquez winning both...since when are kds considered a factor when the fighter comes back and wins almost every other round.and the second fight just proves how retarted judges really are nowadays


                Judges are only ******ed when your fighter lose..

                and not most boxing experts had marquesz winning the fight.. it was around 50/50 with the boxing world..

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by TuRoK'em View Post
                  most boxing experts had marquez winning both...since when are kds considered a factor when the fighter comes back and wins almost every other round.and the second fight just proves how retarted judges really are nowadays

                  Yeah I agree. Scoring a 3 KD 10-7.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by miron_lang View Post
                    Yeah I agree. Scoring a 3 KD 10-7.
                    the second fight you dog eater

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      I scored the first fight by two point to JMM at the time, and the second fight by a point, I seem to remember feeling sorry and admiring the way JMM cameback after three knockdown in the first round but the second fight was a bit closer than the first.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP