Originally posted by Kagami Taiga
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Cotto Saw Golovkin's WBC Spot as Financially Motivated
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by OnePunch View Posthey Miguel, you didnt seem to mind when for financial reasons the WBC allowed Martinez to fight YOU (even though you were not even ranked at 160)
That was just peachy. But now its a problem? lol
The biggest prostitute in the sport is whining because other people think about money too.
Laughable........
p.s. and Im sure GGG's attorneys appreciate you admitting that you agreed to pay him the $800k. That statement will be quite helpful to them......
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sorrow View PostThat would make no sense he isn't only the Mandatory he is the interim champion that means if the Champion vacate's or is stripped of his belt the Interim is automatically upgraded to full champion,Obviously there is a lot of politics going around but by the ruling Alvarez shouldn't be able to fight for the belt now that Cotto has been stripped.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kagami Taiga View PostSmh its not at all the same thing.
A future contract mandates that you are obligated to make/take delivery of the goods at a certain time no matter what happens. Even if the market goes against you, you're still obligated to perform your duties.
Cotto's not off the hook because he ran into issues with WBC.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kagami Taiga View PostGolovkin would not currently be anything. He would still have to fight for a vacant title. Smh u guys really don't know much about the rules huh?
Also remember, the WBC, WBA, and IBF ratified some of their rules this spring in regards to unifications and they agreed to make it a goal of having a single unified champion. Which is why you now see Kovalev & Golovkin as WBC interim champions while holding other titles.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eastcoast View PostIncorrect, they've already stated that as their interim champion he will be elevated to full champion status should Saturday's winner not fight him. Even so, then that's a title fight Golovkin's been deprived and thus suffered monetary damage.
Also remember, the WBC, WBA, and IBF ratified some of their rules this spring in regards to unifications and they agreed to make it a goal of having a single unified champion. Which is why you now see Kovalev & Golovkin as WBC interim champions while holding other titles.
Comment
-
Originally posted by j0zef View PostYou are correct, OnePunch used the wrong term. It's not equivalent to an option contract, but a future contract.
A future contract mandates that you are obligated to make/take delivery of the goods at a certain time no matter what happens. Even if the market goes against you, you're still obligated to perform your duties.
Cotto's not off the hook because he ran into issues with WBC.
Im sure glad none of you guys are representing any of my interests.......lol
Comment
-
Originally posted by j0zef View PostYou are correct, OnePunch used the wrong term. It's not equivalent to an option contract, but a future contract.
A future contract mandates that you are obligated to make/take delivery of the goods at a certain time no matter what happens. Even if the market goes against you, you're still obligated to perform your duties.
Cotto's not off the hook because he ran into issues with WBC.
Comment
Comment