wlad gets away with an insane amount of clinching in all his fights, especially since his last defeat, it's become an integral part of his game plan.. but if his fights were refereed fairly he would have either been deducted quite a few points for clinching, it might have stopped him from clinching excessively during those fights, or he literally could have been disqualified - he clinches excessively enough to make disqualification a real possibility (if the fight was refereed according to the rules)..
so which of his fights would he have lost if he'd not been able to clinch so much? would Haye, Povetkin and others have been able to catch him a lot easier if referees enforced the rules correctly since they wouldnt have to deal with wladimir grabbing and leaning all over them repeatedly, sapping their strength through the fight?
since his last defeat to brewster, who else would have beaten wladimir if you take away the excessive clinching?
so which of his fights would he have lost if he'd not been able to clinch so much? would Haye, Povetkin and others have been able to catch him a lot easier if referees enforced the rules correctly since they wouldnt have to deal with wladimir grabbing and leaning all over them repeatedly, sapping their strength through the fight?
since his last defeat to brewster, who else would have beaten wladimir if you take away the excessive clinching?
Comment