Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Do you believe any of the 9/11 conspiracy theories?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts



  • In the wake of the September 11th attacks, Mike Ruppert was among the first to be publicly critical of a number of transparent flaws in the official story presented by the US government. Mike is a former LAPD narcotics investigator who discoverd CIA trafficking drugs in 1977. After attempting to expose to corruption, he was forced out of LAPD while earning the highest rating reports possible and having no disciplinary actions. Mike has been shot at by people who have tried to keep him from bringing his findings to light. In more than 80 stories since 9-11, he has followed his tested strategy of using only government documents, official statements or verifiable press reports as the basis for his work. As a result, he has been openly received by several members of Congress and maintains open lines of communications with congressional and committee staff. Mike gave his first post 9-11 lecture at Portland State University, which was attended by more that 1,000 citizens and resulted in a standing ovation. "The Truth and Lies of 9-11" is the video of that event, including specail exclusive interviews with Ron Paul, Cynthia McKinney, Barbara Lee, and Dillon Reed.

    Contents:
    Main titles – Opening montage - 00:00:00
    Special 2004 Introduction by Mike Ruppert - 00:01:12
    Rep. Barbara Lee, Floor Speech – Sept. 2001 00:08:11
    Portland State – Overview, JFK, DCI Confrontation (‘96) - 00:10:23
    Mike Ruppert Personal History - 00:23:28
    CIA and Drugs (Economics and Oil) - 00:25:54
    CIA & Wall Street, Drug Money and The “Pop” - 00:31:10
    The Bush Family - 00:36:43
    Money Laundering – Enron - 00:39:02
    Catherine Austin Fitts - 00:43:32
    Loopholes, the “Pop”, Citigroup - 00:47:15
    Looting the Treasury – Professor John Metzger, Michigan State - 00:57:07
    Peak Oil - 01:01:39
    Advance Warnings, Bin Laden & Bush, The Carlyle Group - 01:02:18
    Insider Trading - 01:07:48
    PROMIS - 01:11:51
    Taliban and Opium – Professor Peter Dale Scott - 01:13:00
    Oil, Pipelines, Central Asia and China - 01:17:12
    Brzezinski, The Grand Chessboard, Looting Russia, Halliburton - 01:21:26
    9/11 Timeline - 01:36:28
    Prisons & Social Security - 01:55:46
    Civil Liberties – Congressman Ron Paul - 01:59:00
    Cele Castillo (DEA), Dave Sabow (USMC) - 02:07:51
    Biowar and Vaccinations - 02:09:56
    Operation Northwoods - 02:11:07
    What Can We Do? – Congressman Ron Paul - 02:12:20
    Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney – Empire – Conclusion - 02:18:37
    End Credits - 02:21:30

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Panopticon View Post
      I dont need to. Calm down. All you have done is looked for any little unsupported hypothesis to give you a crutch for your 9/11 arguement.



      How dare you say that these people are only giving unsupported opinions. They are giving you the fact of the matter.
      So perhaps you could make it easy for me and explain what it is that they are saying, just a synopsis is fine, together with their evidence which makes it more than just unsupported opinion.

      Comment


      • ZERO: An Investigation into 9/11, has one central thesis - that the official version of the events surrounding the attacks on 9/11 can not be true. This brand new feature documentary from Italian production company Telemaco explores the latest scientific evidence and reveals dramatic new witness testimony, which directly conflicts with the US Government's account. Featuring presentations from intellectual heavy weights; Gore Vidal, and Noble Prize winner Dario Fo, the film challenges assumptions surrounding the attacks. In the words of the Italian daily newspaper, Il Corriere de da Sera, "What results is a sequence of contradictions, gaps, and omissions of stunning gravity." The importance of this film can not be overstated. If its thesis is correct, the justification for going to war in Iraq is built on a series of outrageous lies.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by squealpiggy View Post
          So perhaps you could make it easy for me and explain what it is that they are saying, just a synopsis is fine, together with their evidence which makes it more than just unsupported opinion.
          You havent injected that mercury in your brain just yet. Why dont you do it you lazy dumb fuck?


          Its as simple as pushing play and paying attention. Can you do that?

          Comment


          • ZERO: An Investigation into 9/11, has one central thesis - that the official version of the events surrounding the attacks on 9/11 can not be true.
            That's shocking. What do they propose is the alternate theory, and what evidence led them to that conclusion!?

            Comment


            • Originally posted by squealpiggy View Post
              That's shocking. What do they propose is the alternate theory, and what evidence led them to that conclusion!?
              Nothing secret. The same information that has been available to you for over 8 years. You will never get it.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Panopticon View Post
                Nothing secret. The same information that has been available to you for over 8 years. You will never get it.
                So which alternate theory is it? Hologram planes? Pods? Military jets painted in American Airlines colours? Drones? Controlled demolition? Atomic resonators? Who did it? The CIA? The FBI? The Illuminati? The Bush administration? The JEWS?

                All of the above have been pushed by "truth" liars so is it one of those or something different?

                You said that this was NEW research. What's new about it if it's the "same information that has been available... for over 8 years"?

                I would expect there to be at least a hypothesis with evidence, considering how the "official story" is so flimsy. So what is it, and what evidence led you to that conclusion?

                Comment


                • Originally posted by squealpiggy View Post
                  So which alternate theory is it? Hologram planes? Pods? Military jets painted in American Airlines colours? Drones? Controlled demolition? Atomic resonators? Who did it? The CIA? The FBI? The Illuminati? The Bush administration? The JEWS?

                  All of the above have been pushed by "truth" liars so is it one of those or something different?

                  You said that this was NEW research. What's new about it if it's the "same information that has been available... for over 8 years"?

                  I would expect there to be at least a hypothesis with evidence, considering how the "official story" is so flimsy. So what is it, and what evidence led you to that conclusion?
                  Hologram planes is your theory. Drones, Pods, space weapons, all of those are disinfo presented by half wits like you to insist that any deviation of the official story is nothing but unproven conspiracy theory.



                  You really are pathetic.


                  This one is about what the Intelligence Agencies were doing.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Panopticon View Post
                    Hologram planes is your theory. Drones, Pods, space weapons, all of those are disinfo presented by half wits like you to insist that any deviation of the official story is nothing but unproven conspiracy theory.



                    You really are pathetic.


                    This one is about what the Intelligence Agencies were doing.

                    OK that video is over an hour long. Summarize it. What is their theory about what happened and what is their evidence?

                    Wait, let me guess: There's not a theory involved, nor is their any evidence. It's yet another bloviating waste of time in which a pompous dip**** asks "questions" about the official story...

                    What happened on 9/11 then? And what is the evidence that led you to that conclusion?

                    Comment


                    • I realized a while ago that you dont have the knowledge of global politics to really fathom 9/11.


                      Why dont you watch this film here and give an opinion on it?
                      http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=318348



                      Until you can recognize the powers and influence of the banking and corporate elite over government and politics, this debate is pointless.


                      You really think Al Qaeda can compete with The Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP