Who do you consider the best knowledgeable unbiased poster on Boxing Scene?

[Walt Liquor]

If you can formulate an argument otherwise im going to stick with:

Irondan-great fukn poster, somewhat biased against froch, somewhat floyd apologist.


Wah

[Walt Liquor]

Shi t, i apparently need to remove the anti-froch(bias) tag.

[IronDanHamza]

Cuz you shunned someone cuz of an educated opinion. That shows bias. Not hard to figure out.

I'm not so sure it does.

[IronDanHamza]

Shi t, i apparently need to remove the anti-froch(bias) tag.

You could also go ahead and remove that Floyd apologist tag aswell

Perhaps a "Biased against Doug Fischer" tag?

[Walt Liquor]

You could also go ahead and remove that Floyd apologist tag aswell

Perhaps a "Biased against Doug Fischer" tag?

Its the reason behind it

[IronDanHamza]

Its the reason behind it

I just told you that that isn't the reason

Perhaps we should watch the Cotto fight now, brother It's about to start.

[Walt Liquor]

Thx for proving my point. If the only public reason why you cant follow a very good boxing writer (who has given public props to your favorite writer cliff rold btw and hired him in the past) is because of his views of floyd then it displays some bias.

And there's nothing really wrong with that. U just cant claim to be unbiased.

[IronDanHamza]

Thx for proving my point. If the only public reason why you cant follow a very good boxing writer (who has given public props to your favorite writer cliff rold btw and hired him in the past) is because of his views of floyd then it displays some bias.

And there's nothing really wrong with that. U just cant claim to be unbiased.

You've got to be joking, or something.

[NChristo]

Thanks for the love guys, I really appreciate it.

My votes (In terms of knowledgeable) goes to NChristo, GreatA, Benny, the list goes on and on to be honest, it's hard to narrow it down to just a handful of guys because despite the fact there's such a long list of moron's on here there's also a long list of great guys, there's just a lot more idiots . That's more from a historical standpoint, though. In terms of breaking down fights, there's quite a lot of guys on here, amongst an amassment of ****, that know their Boxing.

This **** here deserves to be at the top of the unbias great post list. Jabs too

Thanks.


Are you 2 really arguing over this ?, seems a bit silly, especially given that Dan is clearly bias, really thinks Johnson should of got the decision over Pastrano

[IronDanHamza]

Thanks.


Are you 2 really arguing over this ?, seems a bit silly, especially given that Dan is clearly bias, really thinks Johnson should of got the decision over Pastrano

Nah, I'm only biased toward Johnson because I don't like Nat Fleischer.

You know who I am biased toward? John H Stracey.