I really don't think that the Bena fight was a "robbery" per se. There were so many swing rounds that it could have gone either way.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Which decision was worse, Herrera/Garcia or Herrera/Benavidas?
Collapse
-
-
-
-
-
Originally posted by doubletake View PostBoth bad.
Herrera beat Garcia to win the Lineal championship. He was robbed of his victory.
Herrera beat Benavidez to retain his WBA interim title. He was robbed of his victory.
The only brightside to all of this is that if Herrera would've been given the decision against Danny, but robbed by Arum, Benavidez would now be the lineal champion. It's sickening just thinking of that.
Either way, he was robbed twice this year, and both were equally as bad.
Wow, I never thought of it like that, smh. Criminal, just criminal
Comment
-
-
I voted both equally bad cause they both were plain robberies but the garcia one had more meaning behind it. Herrera would become world champ and be the #1 guy at 140 and all the new paychecks that comes with that instead he realistically lost millions of potential dollar he could have made had he wasnt robbed.
Comment
Comment