Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why is boxing history discussed in the first place?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by The_One77 View Post
    I dont understand why fans of the sport constantly discuss and argue old time fights from the 50-80's, everyone knows that they couldn't box for **** in those days.
    Its ridiculous to even compare someone like a Rocky Marciano to a David Haye or Monte Barret because Rocky would lose everytime, boxers from the 70's are the equivilent in skill as teenage amateurs on the circuit today.

    Its called evolution of the sport, someone like a Muhammad Ali could not defeat fighters of this era. This is why he got outclassed by some dude called Trevor Bercock.
    I dont even see fighters like SRL and Marvin Hagler going the distance against Joe Calzaghe despite how good they were in their prime, fighters of today are superiour in terms of boxing knowledge and new nutritional technology.

    Another example is Mike Tyson, good in his time but outclassed by a newer superiour althlete in Evander and Lewis. He would of been demolished by Vitali too, too small and too fragile for those guys.

    THe boxing history board is utterly hysterical and a waste of space on this website, it should be removed IMO. Nobody cares about old time fighters like Ali, Monzon etc
    People need to see this thread as to why boxing fans should know about the past.

    Comment


    • #12
      got to be a joke, nobodys this stupid.

      Comment


      • #13
        Once again Im proved right

        Wladimer Klitskcho destroying boxing's past in Hasim Rahman and Rahman weighed 40lbs more than Ali!
        LOL ALi would not last more than 7 rounds against Wladimer.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by The_One77 View Post
          I dont understand why fans of the sport constantly discuss and argue old time fights from the 50-80's, everyone knows that they couldn't box for **** in those days.
          Its ridiculous to even compare someone like a Rocky Marciano to a David Haye or Monte Barret because Rocky would lose everytime, boxers from the 70's are the equivilent in skill as teenage amateurs on the circuit today.

          Its called evolution of the sport, someone like a Muhammad Ali could not defeat fighters of this era. This is why he got outclassed by some dude called Trevor Bercock.
          I dont even see fighters like SRL and Marvin Hagler going the distance against Joe Calzaghe despite how good they were in their prime, fighters of today are superiour in terms of boxing knowledge and new nutritional technology.

          Another example is Mike Tyson, good in his time but outclassed by a newer superiour althlete in Evander and Lewis. He would of been demolished by Vitali too, too small and too fragile for those guys.

          THe boxing history board is utterly hysterical and a waste of space on this website, it should be removed IMO. Nobody cares about old time fighters like Ali, Monzon etc
          WORST POST IN HISTOry AWARD.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by The_One77 View Post
            Once again Im proved right

            Wladimer Klitskcho destroying boxing's past in Hasim Rahman and Rahman weighed 40lbs more than Ali!
            LOL ALi would not last more than 7 rounds against Wladimer.
            aNoThEr SHOCKER....... thanks for banning these trolls.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by The_One77 View Post
              I dont understand why fans of the sport constantly discuss and argue old time fights from the 50-80's, everyone knows that they couldn't box for **** in those days.
              Its ridiculous to even compare someone like a Rocky Marciano to a David Haye or Monte Barret because Rocky would lose everytime, boxers from the 70's are the equivilent in skill as teenage amateurs on the circuit today.

              Its called evolution of the sport, someone like a Muhammad Ali could not defeat fighters of this era. This is why he got outclassed by some dude called Trevor Bercock.
              I dont even see fighters like SRL and Marvin Hagler going the distance against Joe Calzaghe despite how good they were in their prime, fighters of today are superiour in terms of boxing knowledge and new nutritional technology.

              Another example is Mike Tyson, good in his time but outclassed by a newer superiour althlete in Evander and Lewis. He would of been demolished by Vitali too, too small and too fragile for those guys.

              THe boxing history board is utterly hysterical and a waste of space on this website, it should be removed IMO. Nobody cares about old time fighters like Ali, Monzon etc
              what most of the modern greats have in common is that they studdied the oldtimers

              boxing technicique is a lost art in some regards

              if u dont like it here then go back to NSB

              they will welcome your theorys there

              Comment

              Working...
              X
              TOP