Originally posted by Mr. Fantastic
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Does Oscar De La Hoya have the best name Losses of all time?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Mr. Fantastic View PostI stopped reading there. Gotta love the anti-Europe boxing fans. Boxing is a worldwide sport and talent is everywhere.
Comment
-
Originally posted by FeFist View PostHe's passed his prime..... Nothing now can take away from his previous displays and accomplishments which were quite frankly phenomenal.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mr. Fantastic View PostRoy Jones resume isn't special. Yes Oscars resume is better than Jones. Jones got hyped up to **** cause he was an AA who moved really pretty vs your average trashman/cop.
Originally posted by Mr. Fantastic View PostTo idiots? A person losing should matter in a boxing legacy unless it's favoritism which is what you're displaying.
Only an idiot would hold a loss when a fighter is an utter shell of himself against them.
Only an idiot would hold Ali's loss to Berbick against him, Ray Leonard's loss to Camacho, Benny Leonard's loss to Mclarnin, Ray Robinson's loss to Archer, the list goes on and on and on.
@ Favouritism.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Big Dunn View PostHow is that anti-Europe? I didn't say there was no talent, just less talent. so, as I suspected, your agenda is about the Klits and not about tito or ODH.
It's not about the Klits. It's about Tito/Oscar mostly.
FYI man I'm Mexican/American. Oscar is my all time favorite boxer but I know he isn't the greatest ever like most fan boy on here claim their boxer to be.
Comment
-
Originally posted by IronDanHamza View PostIt isn't special in comparison to a long list of other ATG's. It's obviously better than Oscar's, though.
Yes, to idiots.
Only an idiot would hold a loss when a fighter is an utter shell of himself against them.
Only an idiot would hold Ali's loss to Berbick against him, Ray Leonard's loss to Camacho, Benny Leonard's loss to Mclarnin, Ray Robinson's loss to Archer, the list goes on and on and on.
@ Favouritism.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mr. Fantastic View PostThat is such a load of crap right there.
It's not about the Klits. It's about Tito/Oscar mostly.
FYI man I'm Mexican/American. Oscar is my all time favorite boxer but I know he isn't the greatest ever like most fan boy on here claim their boxer to be.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mr. Fantastic View PostNot to idiots, just not nuthuggers. As an Oscar fan I still count the loss he suffered to Pac. Why? Because I'm not a fanboy like the rest of the true idiots on here. All those losses should count and they do because boxing is built on the new beating the old some of the times. If you'd been watching it for a while, you'd understand where I'm coming from.
Don't amuse me.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Big Dunn View PostThen why does everyone come to the US to fight? Money and talent. I don't care what race/nationality you are. Point is Hopkins fought people we knew, Calzaghe didn't. Its not race, it competition.
Only reason Hopkins fought more people we knew because they were on American tv. Even then most of them were "I don't know who the **** this guy is".
Comment
-
Comment