Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Daniel Jacobs hints at the GGG fight happening in 2016

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • So Canelo can negotiate with Khan and make a fight.

    Wade can negotiate with GGG and make a fight.

    Stevenson can negotiate with Kov and make a fight, but Team Kov pull out.

    But Jacobs and GGG can't negotiate and many of GGG's fans find ways to defend it HeroBando OnePunch JOZef

    Welcome to the Twilight Zone

    Comment






    • WBA called out Tom Loeffler.

      And just like the past 2 month's, Loeffler still won't mention Jacobs despite saying Jacobs was a bigger threat to GGG than Canelo and that GGG-Jacobs would do huge number in NYC

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Chollo Vista View Post




        WBA called out Tom Loeffler.

        And just like the past 2 month's, Loeffler still won't mention Jacobs despite saying Jacobs was a bigger threat to GGG than Canelo and that GGG-Jacobs would do huge number in NYC
        They've already said they won't do anything until the WBC make a decision

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Hougigo View Post
          They've already said they won't do anything until the WBC make a decision
          Not exactly.

          They said they didn't want to step on the WBC's toes. The problem with that is is the Canelo-GGG fight isn't until September. And that's IF, it happens considering the deal with the catchweight.

          I never understood what April had to do with September unless they were banking on GGG possibly losing and spoiling the fight in Sept?

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Chollo Vista View Post
            Not exactly.

            They said they didn't want to step on the WBC's toes. The problem with that is is the Canelo-GGG fight isn't until September. And that's IF, it happens considering the deal with the catchweight.

            I never understood what April had to do with September unless they were banking on GGG possibly losing and spoiling the fight in Sept?
            Why should the WBA care about some other organization's belt?

            They just want in on GGG/Canelo if it happens, which is why they're not doing anything

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Chollo Vista View Post
              Not exactly.

              They said they didn't want to step on the WBC's toes. The problem with that is is the Canelo-GGG fight isn't until September. And that's IF, it happens considering the deal with the catchweight.

              I never understood what April had to do with September unless they were banking on GGG possibly losing and spoiling the fight in Sept?
              Why do you keep ignoring the reason you have heard multiple times?

              GGG has to to do a mandatory defense of his IBF belt, the only way to circumvent that would be a unification (Saunders or Canelo).

              We all know that neither of them want to fight GGG yet. GGG is also recognized as THE WBA "Super" champion, Jacobs only holds the regular belt. So GGG either has to fight his IBF mandatory (Johnson had an injury so it has to be Wade) or unify against Saunders or Canelo.

              Did you finally understand it?

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Jubei View Post
                Why do you keep ignoring the reason you have heard multiple times?

                GGG has to to do a mandatory defense of his IBF belt, the only way to circumvent that would be a unification (Saunders or Canelo).

                We all know that neither of them want to fight GGG yet. GGG is also recognized as THE WBA "Super" champion, Jacobs only holds the regular belt. So GGG either has to fight his IBF mandatory (Johnson had an injury so it has to be Wade) or unify against Saunders or Canelo.

                Did you finally understand it?
                No, I don't understand because before Johnson was even mentioned as a mandatory we heard about BJS. Before Wade was mentioned as a mandatory we heard about Matt Korobov, but no Jacobs.

                That said, why do you keep mentioning "da belts doe" when Jacobs is the #2 Ring MW coming off the best win in the division?

                And if we're being technical, the only 3 belts that matter in boxing are the WBC, IBF and WBA. It's been like that since the 80's. If you've followed the sport, you'd know the WBO is a bullschit belt that just came along not to long ago to further help water down the title "champion".
                Last edited by Chollo Vista; 02-02-2016, 08:59 PM.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Hougigo View Post
                  Why should the WBA care about some other organization's belt?
                  Exactly my thoughts

                  Comment


                  • Cheers to Eastcoast for finding this:



                    “Being able to make this fight with Wade, if (Golovkin is) successful, then certainly a fight with Danny Jacobs, who is clearly at the top also of the middleweight division – he had a very impressive knockout of Peter Quillin,” Loeffler told ******.com. “And Gennady being able to sell out (Madison Square Garden) in his last fight – you can only imagine how big a fight between Gennady and Jacobs would be in New York. That would be a monster fight in the New York area. From our side, there wouldn’t be any obstacles to making that fight.”

                    http://******.craveonline.com/news/4...eKkPeg.twitter


                    Just as I've been saying for the last 20 pages.

                    Comment


                    • Jacobs -> Showtime
                      GGG -> HBO

                      End of story.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP