Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why is Marquez, Arum and Co abandoning Bradley's requests for USADA and VADA testing?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by Pacquiao'd View Post
    Isn't Conte with VADA. And what have you seen in Floyd's performances that subjects he's doping? Can't say the same for Pacjuiceman doe.
    He advocates their use he's not 'with' them...what about 'Pacjuiceman's' performance suggest he's doping?

    Comment


    • #12
      Occam's razor.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by radioraheem View Post
        It depends in the protocol of the NSAC random testing. Too bad they won't speak on it much til after the fight. But I think it's a step in the right direction.

        First, it forces NSAC to take drug testing more seriously. Second, some complain how the fighters aren't being tested year round. With NSAC doing random testing now, year round testing can realistically happen in the future, with less conflict of interest. And if NSAC isn't bluffing about it being the strictest testing in boxing yet, then there can be no complaints really. So we'll see... you never know with NSAC.


        Why couldn't they just mention at least that they're using CIR? Funny how Arum stepped in seemingly against VADA or USADA.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by Pacquiao'd View Post
          But you believe in those ducktales juiceman and his team were telling "let the commission do their job"
          I just don't care, I assume most guys are on something, like in much better run sports with much stricter testing.. This promoter contracted testing is a joke, it's a built in conflict of interest.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by KeepItObjective View Post
            He advocates their use he's not 'with' them...what about 'Pacjuiceman's' performance suggest he's doping?
            His change once Ariza came then his decline in power and stamina since the cheato fight

            Comment


            • #16
              Why are people surprised?

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by Russian Crushin View Post
                Thats and USADA said they will not do testing with another company participating, sounds like they didnt wanna get cross checked
                Oh yeah? You have a link? TBH double testing is dumb, and extra expense and hassle that's totally unnecessary, provided these guys are trustworthy and impartial. If they're not, then the whole thing is a joke.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by Pacquiao'd View Post
                  His change once Ariza came then his decline in power and stamina since the cheato fight
                  Oh you mean dropping the steal chinned Mosley who was begging for the fight to be stopped, and beating him on a wide UD despite having lg cramps.... the same Mosley who made Floyd do the Booty Dew? And getting robbed against a prime undefeated top ten guy in Bradley despite seemingly not bothering much in the fight? And looking fast and powerful before the inch perfect KO punch? Y'all talk so much ish.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by KeepItObjective View Post
                    Oh you mean dropping the steal chinned Mosley who was begging for the fight to be stopped, and beating him on a wide UD despite having lg cramps.... the same Mosley who made Floyd do the Booty Dew? And getting robbed against a prime undefeated top ten guy in Bradley despite seemingly not bothering much in the fight? And looking fast and powerful before the inch perfect KO punch? Y'all talk so much ish.
                    Don't act like Shane didn't fall bc of his legs, the punch hardly connected

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Interesting that when Pacquiao ducks testing it means Floyd is ducking, but when someone else ducks a test it's suspicious.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP