Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Guys, can we at least agree that Kovalev is stronger than Froch?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    If there is a light heavyweight who can beat Kovalev it's Ward. If there is a light heavyweight who can beat Ward it's Kovalev. I think either of them can beat Stevenson or any other light heavyweight with the possible exception of that other hard punching Russian.

    Comment


    • #22
      Kovalev is stronger. Froch is taller, got longer reach, got a better chin, better stamina and is more experienced against top level opposition. Their skills are at around the same level. Both are skilled enough, but limited.

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by TheBoxingXpert View Post
        Kovalev is stronger. Froch is taller, got longer reach, got a better chin, better stamina and is more experienced against top level opposition. Their skills are at around the same level. Both are skilled enough, but limited.
        Froch had 2nd thoughts about facing a 50 year old Hopkins at 170, that's all you have to know. Swerve Ggg like the plague, if you still have any doubt

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by TheBoxingXpert View Post
          Kovalev is stronger. Froch is taller, got longer reach, got a better chin, better stamina and is more experienced against top level opposition. Their skills are at around the same level. Both are skilled enough, but limited.
          Nope Kovalev is much better boxer, froch jabs,footwork is not on the same level as Kovalev no way in hell.

          Comment

          Working...
          X
          TOP