Did marquez KO proved his better than pac?

[SplitSecond]

stylisticly a nightmare for pacquiao

on steroids is actually on pacquiao's level(arguably won the 3rd fight too)

wobbled pacquiao in the third, kd'd and ko'd him in the fourth while taking a hellashious beating

marquez is a little below pacquiao, roidquez is right there with him though, evenly matched

but atg/resume/accomplishments wise, pacquiao by miles

[solo20]

I hope the POLL results set you straight. (They won't)

Pac leads the series 3-1 if the one judge didn't make a math error on knock downs in the first round. Also, Manny was dominating the 4th fight at the time the punch of the decade landed.

Manny is clearly the better fighter overall.

another Paccrap who just watches highlights IF THE REF KNEW THE RULES PAC should have been disqualified for hitting JMM when he was down or a point taken away in that round I find it amusing these Paccraps like to talk about the judge error but never talk about the ref error
who is better MAN TO MAN ITS WITHOUT A DOUBT JMM .

[Boxing Goat]

And only 1 knock out mattered in the end. And Marquez owned it.


Over.

So basically what you are saying is that landing a one in a million lucky KO erases basically losing 3 previous fights by decision?

Got it. You're just dumb.

Over and out.

[Shambrolic]

Marquez is obviously more skilled, Pacquiao is just much more athletic so he can overwhelm his opponents.

Marquez fights with his mind better than everyone not named Mayweather. Bradley caught an old Marquez, let it be the JMM a couple years ago, Marquez would had let those combinations set Bradley up with patient calm aggression. Marquez now is impatient and is not being a scientist, if we go off his last performance.

Looking at the poll, shows the ignorance that plague this boxing community.

[Boxing Goat]

if you're talking active fighters, i agree with you. his resume better than hopkins' and mayweather's.

I was talking active fighters obviously and to answer the Hoyfield guys rebuttal:

A) He's not active

B) Holyfield lost too many fights during his prime to be considered having even close to a better resume than Pacquiao.

[Bushbaby]

So basically what you are saying is that landing a one in a million lucky KO erases basically losing 3 previous fights by decision?

Got it. You're just dumb.

Over and out.

I'm dumb?? Coming from the guy that calls Marquez koing Pacman lucky?? OK??

[soul_survivor]

Pacquiao is faster, stronger, hits harder, better stamina, better offensive skills, better footwork.

JMM is a better counterpuncher and has better PED connections.

Guess who's better?

Yeah, the guy who won 2 out of 4 fights.

It's like saying Norton is better than Ali just because he came close to beating him 3 times.

[Shambrolic]

Pacquaio greatness was carefully crafted, just by analyzing who he fought and when he fought them while avoiding JMM until he thought he was old and Pacquiao handlers thought Pacauiao improved.

JMM has the mind and skills that surpasses a Pacquiao and fighters that aren't technical. Pacquiao just has size on him, just like everyone else in the welter division. Anyway get to know that great technical brain known as JMM and his skills.
[youtube]http://youtu.be/GfBmqlO6rh4[/YouTube]

[Boxing Goat]

another Paccrap who just watches highlights IF THE REF KNEW THE RULES PAC should have been disqualified for hitting JMM when he was down or a point taken away in that round I find it amusing these Paccraps like to talk about the judge error but never talk about the ref error
who is better MAN TO MAN ITS WITHOUT A DOUBT JMM .

Lol @ DQ'd. It was a judgement call man get over it and look at the POLL results.

[hugh grant]

Pacs more skilled than JMM. He beat him more times and was ahead on the 4th fight. Being ko'ed don't mean you are less skilled.

So the fact Pac won 3 fights don't mean he is more skilled or has more ability then? So if that's the case all of Floyds opponents he beat are more skilled than Floyd. Gatti was more skilled than Floyd as was hatton.

We can all be childish cant we?