It's your list to arranged any way you want but since you asked for opinions my opinion is you have GGG much too low and Ward much too high on the list. GGG never loses a fight and seldom even loses a round. He has defended his titles 17 times winning all by KO. He recently destroyed world champion Lemieux. He can box and he punches harder than anyone else pound for pound. He has an iron jaw and has never been knocked down or hurt. He fights 4 times a year instead of once or twice a year like most champs. Those are my reasons why I think he should be higher. Ward was once a top pound for pound guy. It's been about 5 years since he has fought anybody very good. I don't think he still deserves to be at the top of the list unless and until he beats Kovalev.
I sure can't agree with Danny Garcia being higher than Thurman. Thurman is just so much better. Guerrero would tell you that. Garcia stopped fighting tough guys years ago right after he beat Matthysse. Thurman has fought much better opposition at 147. He just beat Porter and Porter would beat Garcia in my opinion. Danny's welterweight wins are Paulie and Guerrero and that isn't much to brag about.
i take it recent activity doesnt matter in your pound for pound lists. Cause youve got someone as number 1 who hasnt fought remotely good fighter in 5 years lol. Surprised james toney, roy jones jr arent in your list too
Comment