Originally posted by ThePhantom5
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Vanes martirosyan got played by the WBC
Collapse
-
Originally posted by WeedHead View PostI heard an interview with Vanes...... Vanes thought that if it's not in writing and they don't live up to their word by giving him the fight, if he beats Lara no one else is gonna wanna fight him because he would be considered too dangerous, high risk low reward type fighter.
So we can blame WBC....
How's the Ouma rematch coming along?
Comment
-
Originally posted by davis828 View PostSpeak for yourself.
How's the Ouma rematch coming along?
Comment
-
Originally posted by WeedHead View PostI heard an interview with Vanes and he clarified the whole situation with the WBC. He wanted to fight Lara but the WBC refused to put in writing that the fight would be a Final Eliminator for the Alvarez shot and Vanes thought that if it's not in writing and they don't live up to their word by giving him the fight, if he beats Lara no one else is gonna wanna fight him because he would be considered too dangerous, high risk low reward type fighter.
So we can blame WBC for not officially putting it in writing, all they had to do was make it official that this fight was an eliminator. Vanes said that his fight with Roman was supposed to be the Eliminator but when he later checked Boxrec it said semi final eliminator, instead of just eliminator and he realised he got played by the WBC. For the Lara fight he didn't want it to happen again so he needed it in writing from WBC but they refused.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TOBYLEE1 View PostThis is the WBC we are talking about. Canelo didn't have to fight his way into the title and neither did Chavez Jr.
Look how they have had Martinez jumping through hoops to get a shot against Jr. and now its Vanes and Kirkland having to fight all the top guys to get a shot while Canelo is taking low risk fights.
Vanes should had fought top guys to make a case for himself but simply defending his ranking and his zero is not enough.
Comment
-
Originally posted by WeedHead View Postlisten to the interview, it also got K9 Bundrage interviewing Vanes and he confirms a lot of what Vanes is saying.. and they talk about Don King and how corrupt he is too.. I dunno about Ouma.. does that rematch even matter anymore?
Say he took the Angulo fight and won then took the Lara fight and was victorious, that's a great look for him and boxing as a whole because now we're not talking about who has Vanes fought or how's that Ouma rematch coming along? It's simple, fight and beat who everyone is talking about.... go get Kirkland, Lara, Cotto, etc... Go get Angulo
Comment
-
Originally posted by TOBYLEE1 View PostThis is the WBC we are talking about. Canelo didn't have to fight his way into the title and neither did Chavez Jr.
Look how they have had Martinez jumping through hoops to get a shot against Jr. and now its Vanes and Kirkland having to fight all the top guys to get a shot while Canelo is taking low risk fights.
Vanes should had fought top guys to make a case for himself but simply defending his ranking and his zero is not enough.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Check View PostSo, instead of getting exposure and possibly beating a top fighter, Vanes is going to sit on the sideline and do nothing? What sense does that make? Even if beating Lara didn't lead to Alvarez right away, it would be awesome exposure and lead to some big fights. If Vanes doesn't take this fight, what is he planning on doing that would actually help his career? It's stupid to put so much on one fight(alvarez)
Comment
-
Originally posted by tredh View PostFirst off Vanes has pulled this BS before. It was semi-eliminator meaning he had to win just to get to the FINAL eliminator bout which would have been against Kirkland. Did people forget the meaning of semi-final?
Whats Vanes fascination with the WBC belt? There are other belts that he could fight the good fights for. Vanes on some BS just the WBC is on some BS. Vanes needs to realize you can't BS a richer more powerful BS'er than you!!!
Comment
Comment