Because he was a Yank who didnt get a decision away from home. No further proof needed.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
prove to me dirrell got robbed against froch..
Collapse
-
-
neither of them really won the fight in my mind.
But dirrell did much more to deserve the victory then froch
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by F l i c k e r View PostEvidence of this? Compubox numbers perhaps?
Originally posted by ИATAS206 View Postfroch landed 3% of his punches
dirrell landed about 38%
/thread.
Sorry, but dirrell had a bloody nose, bloody lips, and a swollen eye after 4 rounds froch didnt have a scratch after 12...
So by your horrnedous logic frochs 3 percent landed punches are 1000000 times more powerful than the 38 percent ofpunches landed by dirrell...????
I sorry the fights for all to see, the first rounds i actually cannot even socre for dirrell, he literally did nothing...
How a guy fighting for a wbc title,and not press the fight..it was embarrassing...henc WHY HIS OWN PROMOTER SAID IT WAS NO ROBBERRY...
comon folks the best shot was frochs hook round 8...fact.
Comment
-
No one can prove anything to you.
Your blinded by your love for Froch so it would be pointless.
Point is, Dirrell won this fight. If you have a brain and scored the fight with the four scoring criterias that you follow in pro boxing you would of had Dirrell winning.
Clean effective punching: Dirrell landed consistently, and the shots he threw were clean hard shots. Froch landed rarely and was only able to land one shot at a time.
Ring generalship: Dirrell controlled the tempo of this fight with his movement and speed and all Froch could do was come forward.
Defense: Froch doesn't know the meaning of it and was hit constantly. Dirrell used his movement, head movement, etc to make Froch miss alot and would counter effectively.
Effective agression: Froch was aggressive, but he wasn't effective with it at all. He came forward but landed no shots and was getting countered throughout the fight.
Dirrell held abit yeah, but Froch was no better with his dirty tactics that he used.
Dirrell won clearly, and i'm sure the majority agree with me besides Froch fans.
Comment
-
Carl Froch deserved to win.
I scored it 114-113 for Froch, the same as Dan Rafael.
Dirrell's childish behaviour - falling down deliberately, holding, running, sticking out his tongue - was DISGRACEFUL.
Comment
Comment