Yeah you have point there. Ward is fighting Dirrell next, and i think Dirrell is going to take it. If Khan mans up and fights his mandatory Maidana he will get exposed big time. I don't know much about Brinkley is he a tomato can?
Now that i think about it, Khan can't be exposed but he has already been exposed.
Now that i think about it, Khan can't be exposed but he has already been exposed.
People know Khan's weakness is his chin.
I know that, but people are already talking about him on here about him being the best at 140. They are saying things like: He has improved under Roach, the Prescott loss was just a blip etc etc. I personally think he will get exposed again. That is what i meant.
Losing/Having a bad outing = exposed? I wasn't aware.
Dawson was touted as the next P4P best etc, he got exposed as nothing special. Jacobs was hyped too and he got his head taken off. Alexander was being hailed as the top guy at 140 and after watching him against Kotelnik he is far from that. So the three of them were exposed imo.
Dawson was touted as the next P4P best etc, he got exposed as nothing special. Jacobs was hyped too and he got his head taken off. Alexander was being hailed as the top guy at 140 and after watching him against Kotelnik he is far from that. So the three of them were exposed imo.
jacobs was certainly exposed but dawson and alexander could have easily just had bad days at the office (alexander still won though) too soon to say they were exposed or not as good as they are made out to be
People on here criticise boxers for putting too much emphasis on staying undefeated....but as soon as they lose, they get criticised and branded as "exposed".
Some of you guys aren't real fans, just hypocrites .
Comment