This is my first post in the history section, thought i might get some better answers here than elsewhere...
I was reading the other day that the average height of humans in developed countries has increased by several inches over the last hundred or so years due to improved nutrition during the formative years.
I was wondering if people take this into account when comparing Heavyweights across different eras, so someone like Joe Louis who wiki says is 6"2 could today have been as big as say 6"3 or 6"4? Then Jack Johnson (even earlier obviously) could have reached 6"3 or 6"4 also.
It is always brought up that old heavys wouldnt stand a chance today because of the size difference but i dont feel that is fair. Especially with modern training methods where you can put more muscle and still be as effective, someone like Joe Louis would have been a beast in the ring if he was brought up in modern period.
This is mainly for head to head comparisons obviously.
I was reading the other day that the average height of humans in developed countries has increased by several inches over the last hundred or so years due to improved nutrition during the formative years.
I was wondering if people take this into account when comparing Heavyweights across different eras, so someone like Joe Louis who wiki says is 6"2 could today have been as big as say 6"3 or 6"4? Then Jack Johnson (even earlier obviously) could have reached 6"3 or 6"4 also.
It is always brought up that old heavys wouldnt stand a chance today because of the size difference but i dont feel that is fair. Especially with modern training methods where you can put more muscle and still be as effective, someone like Joe Louis would have been a beast in the ring if he was brought up in modern period.
This is mainly for head to head comparisons obviously.
Comment