Thats nonsense. One fight sucked. The other two and the showx card were great. We dont need network fanboys. That **** is beyond ******ed.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Let's be honest here: The Showtime event last night was mediocre at best
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Freedom2013 View PostYes.
Because Paulie had no way of winning (he's feather-fisted and couldn't hurt Broner) the main event wasn't really exciting at all.
Comment
-
I don't know, I thought it was a good show. True Banks-Mitchell 2 might be the worst fight of the year, but the other two had my full attention. Plus I love how Showtime uses Showtime Extreme to bring us other fights from the undercard. They are winning right now. They should never bring Hopkins back as a commentator though.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Freedom2013 View PostYes.
Because Paulie had no way of winning (he's feather-fisted and couldn't hurt Broner) the main event wasn't really exciting at all.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Big Dunn View PostSince when is having a chance to win connected to a good fight? Wlad's last 10 opponenets haven't had a chance to win and you find his fights exciting. The only bad fight was the hwt fight.
Wladimir fights the best who are available and willing, but he's so much better than the other heavyweights it's not competitive. Broner chose the WEAKEST beltholder he could find at 140 and 147.
There are MANY better opponents for Broner:
Mayweather, Matthysse, Berto, Ortiz, Garcia, Khan, Guerrero, Khabib, Olusegun, Alexander, Peterson, Pacquiao, Marquez, Bradley, Rios, Shafikov, Vasquez, and Brook.
Comment
-
It was at best... Horrible. The first fight looked like two drunk guys brawling it out. The second fight was the lamest fight in the history of boxing. The main event was a robbery!
All in all cant see how it was remotely close to anything other than a disaster. The best punch of the fight was a rabbit punch and the best fight of the night was in the crowd. That got the fans more excited than anything.
Comment
Comment