Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

US Orders Blackout Over North Korean Torpedoing Of Gulf Of Mexico Oil Rig

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • US Orders Blackout Over North Korean Torpedoing Of Gulf Of Mexico Oil Rig

    Link.

    http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1367.htm



    A grim report circulating in the Kremlin today written by Russia’s Northern Fleet is reporting that the United States has ordered a complete media blackout over North Korea’s torpedoing of the giant Deepwater Horizon oil platform owned by the World’s largest offshore drilling contractor Transocean that was built and financed by South Korea’s Hyundai Heavy Industries Co. Ltd., that has caused great loss of life, untold billions in economic damage to the South Korean economy, and an environmental catastrophe to the United States.

    Most important to understand about this latest attack by North Korea against its South Korean enemy is that under the existing “laws of war” it was a permissible action as they remain in a state of war against each other due to South Korea’s refusal to sign the 1953 Armistice ending the Korean War.

    To the attack itself, these reports continue, the North Korean “cargo vessel” Dai Hong Dan believed to be staffed by 17th Sniper Corps “suicide” troops left Cuba’s Empresa Terminales Mambisas de La Habana (Port of Havana) on April 18th whereupon it “severely deviated” from its intended course for Venezuela’s Puerto Cabello bringing it to within 209 kilometers (130 miles) of the Deepwater Horizon oil platform which was located 80 kilometers (50 miles) off the coast of the US State of Louisiana where it launched an SSC Sang-o Class Mini Submarine (Yugo class) estimated to have an operational range of 321 kilometers (200 miles).

    On the night of April 20th the North Korean Mini Submarine manned by these “suicidal” 17th Sniper Corps soldiers attacked the Deepwater Horizon with what are believed to be 2 incendiary torpedoes causing a massive explosion and resulting in 11 workers on this giant oil rig being killed outright. Barely 48 hours later, on April 22nd , this North Korean Mini Submarine committed its final atrocity by exploding itself directly beneath the Deepwater Horizon causing this $1 Billion oil rig to sink beneath the seas and marking 2010’s celebration of Earth Day with one of the largest environmental catastrophes our World has ever seen.

    To the reason for North Korea attacking the Deepwater Horizon, these reports say, was to present US President Obama with an “impossible dilemma” prior to the opening of the United Nations Review Conference of the Parties to the Treat on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) set to begin May 3rd in New York.

    This “impossible dilemma” facing Obama is indeed real as the decision he is faced with is either to allow the continuation of this massive oil leak catastrophe to continue for months, or immediately stop it by the only known and proven means possible, the detonation of a thermonuclear device.

    Russian Navy atomic experts in these reports state that should Obama choose the “nuclear option” the most viable weapon at his disposal is the United States B83 (Mk-83) strategic thermonuclear bomb having a variable yield (Low Kiloton Range to 1,200 Kilotons) which with its 12 foot length and 18 inch diameter, and weighing just over 2,400 pounds, is readily able to be deployed and detonated by a remote controlled mini-sub.

    Should Obama choose the “nuclear option” it appears that he would be supported by the International Court of Justice who on July 8, 1996 issued an advisory opinion on the use of nuclear weapons stating that they could not conclude definitively on these weapons use in “extreme circumstances” or “self defense”.

    On the other hand, if Obama chooses the “nuclear option” it would leave the UN’s nuclear conference in shambles with every Nation in the World having oil rigs off their coasts demanding an equal right to atomic weapons to protect their environment from catastrophes too, including Iran.

    To whatever decision Obama makes it remains a fact that with each passing hour this environmental catastrophe grows worse. And even though Obama has ordered military SWAT teams to protect other oil rigs in the Gulf of Mexico from any further attack, and further ordered that all drilling in the Gulf of Mexico be immediately stopped, this massive oil spill has already reached the shores of America and with high waves and more bad weather forecast the likelihood of it being stopped from destroying thousands of miles of US coastland and wildlife appears unstoppable.

    And not just to the environmental catastrophe that is unfolding the only devastation to be wrecked upon the United States and South Korea by this North Korean attack as the economic liabilities associated with this disaster are estimated by these Russian reports to be between $500 Billion to $1.5 Trillion, and which only a declaration of this disaster being an “act of war” would free some the World’s largest corporations from bankruptcy.

    Important to note too in all of these events was that this was the second attack by North Korea on its South Korean enemy, and US ally, in a month as we had reported on in our March 28th report titled “Obama Orders ‘Immediate Stand-down’ After Deadly North Korean Attack” and which to date neither the Americans or South Korea have retaliated for and giving one senior North Korean party leader the courage to openly state that the North Korean military took “gratifying revenge” on South Korea.

    And for those believing that things couldn’t get worse, they couldn’t be more mistaken as new reports coming from Japanese military sources are stating that North Korea is preparing for new launches of its 1,300 kilometer (807 miles) intermediate range ballistic “Rodong” missile which Russian Space Forces experts state is able to “deploy and detonate” an atomic electromagnetic pulse (EMP) device, and which if detonated high in the atmosphere could effectively destroy the American economy for years, if not decades, to come.

    Could it be?

  • #2
    Bollocks. Utter bollocks.

    Sounds like an April fools joke.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Jack Burton View Post
      Bollocks. Utter bollocks.

      Sounds like an April fools joke.
      Of course it is.

      Who ever runs that site sure does seem convinced though.

      Comment


      • #4
        I'm actually for war with North Korea... but it would mean we'd need the 100% blessing of China in one way or another. It completely blows; but the quicker that society is finished, the better.

        Unfortunately, South Korea would face the brunt of the punishment and then would have to take in North Korea, which is a complete ****hole of a country; whereas South Korea is actually very solid and gaining ground.

        I haven't formulated my opinions perfectly on the situation yet, but it's somewhat of a "no win", unless Kim Jong dies, his son is killed and the military throws a Coup to give SK power or something.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Dirt E Gomez View Post
          I'm actually for war with North Korea... but it would mean we'd need the 100% blessing of China in one way or another. It completely blows; but the quicker that society is finished, the better.

          Unfortunately, South Korea would face the brunt of the punishment and then would have to take in North Korea, which is a complete ****hole of a country; whereas South Korea is actually very solid and gaining ground.

          I haven't formulated my opinions perfectly on the situation yet, but it's somewhat of a "no win", unless Kim Jong dies, his son is killed and the military throws a Coup to give SK power or something.
          I agree 100%

          However I'm tired of the whole War+Rebuild thing. Honestly.... I'm sick of it.

          Comment


          • #6
            **** that. The day we go to war with North Korea is the day we get locked up in a 20 year war, and fail to ever completely secure, eventually leading to the downfall of America. There's no good that would come with war with Korea. You can't beat someone who fights like that, just like we will never win the war on terrorism.

            Comment


            • #7
              That better be false.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by BoxingFanFirst View Post
                **** that. The day we go to war with North Korea is the day we get locked up in a 20 year war, and fail to ever completely secure, eventually leading to the downfall of America. There's no good that would come with war with Korea. You can't beat someone who fights like that, just like we will never win the war on terrorism.
                The North Koreans have proven in the past to be a very stubborn enemy. It would be a difficult but not impossible war to win.

                Because North Korea really does have weapons of mass destruction that threaten Japan and other US allies, it would be a more justifiable war than the invasion and occupation of Iraq.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Tunney! View Post
                  The North Koreans have proven in the past to be a very stubborn enemy. It would be a difficult but not impossible war to win.

                  Because North Korea really does have weapons of mass destruction that threaten Japan and other US allies, it would be a more justifiable war than the invasion and occupation of Iraq.
                  You're the biggest joke in boxingscene history if you actually mean that.
                  I LOL'ed when I read this.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    North Korea been busy lately ...

                    A New Phase for Korean Tensions
                    May 20, 2010
                    http://www.cfr.org/publication/22178..._tensions.html

                    With the South Korean finding that a North Korean torpedo was responsible for the sinking of one of its warships in March, focus now shifts to the problematic venue of the UN Security Council. Absent any immediate plans for tough actions directed against the North, the South Korean government is working closely with--and depending on--the United States to lay the groundwork for a case in the Council resulting in clear international disapproval of Pyongyang.

                    The announcement of the interim results of Seoul's investigation came on the eve of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's visit to Tokyo, Beijing (for the Strategic and Economic Dialogue), and Seoul, with the clear intent of making this a major issue on her agenda, particularly with Beijing. But Clinton's briefing book for Beijing is bulging, with Iran and Thailand joining North Korea as items that require special discussions alongside the main issues on the S&ED agenda.

                    China has already signaled its preference to look past the sinking of the Cheonan in favor of its "traditional friendship" with Pyongyang. The PRC was late to issue condolences on the incident, and China's recent decision to host Kim Jong-Il in Beijing only days after meeting with Lee Myung-bak in Shanghai was regarded in Seoul as insensitive in light of the ongoing investigation and North Korea's suspected role in the sinking.

                    South Korean efforts to brief China on the results of the investigation in advance of the May 20 briefing were rebuffed. South Korea needs strong U.S. backing to make the case to China for a UN statement. But given China's discomfort with the issue, a Security Council Presidential Statement is more likely to garner support than another resolution condemning North Korea.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP