Who gets more credit for beating Hatton? Floyd for being the first or Pacquiao?

[hugh grant]

Speaking like you have confidence is a bit different than fighting with confidence. After the Mayweather fight it was clear that Hatton had lost his fighting confidence and even against Lazcano he was a bit slower in his movements to brawl and more cautious. Being more cautious allowed him to be more open to hit and Lazcano took advantage of that. Your first loss usually hurts but the way Mayweather dismantled him and picked him apart systematically really did a lot to Hatton as a person and as a fighter. A part of him was lost in that ring.

Yeah yeah i heard it all before. Especially when it comes to pac from *****s. Cotto was never the same. Morales wasnt the same, wasnt in his prime, yeah sure sure. Against Laczano Hatton had a cold didnt he?
That may have a little bearing on things. But hatton still had enough in the tank to beat decent opponents after losing to floyd. Nothing can justify being sparked in 2 rounds by Pac though and i wont hear any excuses.
Floyd wouldnt have beat hatton in 2 rounds if they fought again. If Floyd beat hatton in 2 rounds in their second fight, it would be a better win than the first fight.
No more excuses!!!!!!

[hugh grant]

What im saying is it isnt possible for Floyds win to have more credibility for all the reasons ive mentioned.

Ive tried to be fair and have asked just what would Pac have needed to have done to get more credit then, and i get no answers?

Pac destroyed Hatton in 2 rounds, so if that dont impress you, what would Pac have needed to have done? Knock Hatton out in 10 seconds perhaps? Im given people who are given Floyd more credit an opportunity to defend their decision.

Ive heard nothing credible in response!

[Mike Hawk]

hmm....im thirsty...anyone want some COKE?????

[The Gambler1981]

What im saying is it isnt possible for Floyds win to have more credibility for all the reasons ive mentioned.

Ive tried to be fair and have asked just what would Pac have needed to have done to get more credit then, and i get no answers?

Pac destroyed Hatton in 2 rounds, so if that dont impress you, what would Pac have needed to have done? Knock Hatton out in 10 seconds perhaps? Im given people who are given Floyd more credit an opportunity to defend their decision.

Ive heard nothing credible in response!

Be the first man to beat him instead of getting sloppy seconds~

[The Gambler1981]

Beating people first has nothing to do with anything. No fights in history go by who beat someone first. Why do people question what Hatton had left after Floyd? What did Hatton have left after the Collazo fight?
How did Floyd take Hattons confidence away? Is that your opinion? Did Hatton tell you that? He sure was confident about beating Pac, he said he wanted to impose his will, strenght and size on Pac from the outset. Nothing about tip toeing around for the first rounds against Pac.

Being the first to do something is always more impressive then following in someone footsteps, even if you do a grander job~