Originally posted by uglypug
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Do you think americans will keep crying about the HW division forever...?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Pirao View PostThe guy I quoted was explicitly talking about the weight divisions below HW. I guess you agree with me then that Messi would whoop Mayweather had he choosen boxing then?
BTW you can save all the hyperbole about NFL athletes that are OMG the most athletic in the world, that **** doesn't matter outside of the USA I'm afraid.
Comment
-
lol at these excuse-making American crybabies.
The American HW champs from the past weren't even real world champs, they were all frauds because they never competed against the superior Soviets/Eastern Europeans in the pros.
All of the best American heavyweights have been destroyed by the Klitschkos and other Eastern Europeans.
The same thing is happening in many other weight classes too.
Soviets/Eastern Europeans weren't allowed to turn pro until the 1990s because of the cold war/iron curtain.
Now Soviets/Eastern Europeans are allowed to turn pro and we're already taking over boxing and are dominating the higher weight classes.
We're also dominating the amatuers. Most of those great amatuers will become great pros.
This is just the beginning of the Eastern European domination.
NFL/NBA is a WEAK EXCUSE.
There are tons of potential Eastern European Heavyweight Boxers who are doing Combat Sambo, MMA, Kickboxing, Hockey, Olympic Wrestling, Olympic Weightlifting, Powerlifting, Worlds Strongest Man Competitions, etc.
America isn't the only country on the planet that has other sports you excuse-making crybabies.
Eastern European fighters are superior.
Vitali and Wlad are the two most dominant fighters of all time.
Either Klitschko beats any HW from any era.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pirao View PostHahaha, what a joker you are. When you stop with your subjective arguments and actually bring something objective to the table, there will be something to discuss with you. Until then, I'll just keep laughing at you, keep it up, you're good for that if nothing else
Why is Pirao ducking this question?
Comment
-
Originally posted by JAB5239 View PostThere would be something to discuss if you weren't terrified to give us YOUR expert opinion on the skills showcased in the video's of Witherspoon and Helenius that I provided. Who do you think had better skills and why?
Why is Pirao ducking this question?
Why is JAB ducking this point? Because he knows it reduces his "video arguments" to nothing.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pirao View PostI have already said that videos don't prove ****, it's a fact. Why did so many "experts" think Lacy would destroy Calzaghe? Why did the RING think hypejobs like Dominick Guinn were the future of the HWs?
Why is JAB ducking this point? Because he knows it reduces his "video arguments" to nothing.
Dopey, Im asking you YOUR opinion on who is more skilled and why. Stop being so scared and answer the question.
And son, video's do prove who has the better skills unless you're a blind man. Now man up!
Comment
-
Originally posted by DOMINATION View Postlol at these excuse-making American crybabies.
The American HW champs from the past weren't even real world champs, they were all frauds because they never competed against the superior Soviets/Eastern Europeans in the pros.
All of the best American heavyweights have been destroyed by the Klitschkos and other Eastern Europeans.
The same thing is happening in many other weight classes too.
Soviets/Eastern Europeans weren't allowed to turn pro until the 1990s because of the cold war/iron curtain.
It would have been nice to see them compete in the pro ranks back then and no doubt some would have done well but there is no evidence to suggest they would have dominated.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post
Dopey, Im asking you YOUR opinion on who is more skilled and why. Stop being so scared and answer the question.
And son, video's do prove who has the better skills unless you're a blind man. Now man up!
Repeating the same thing over and over when it's already been disproven, pathetic but not surprising.
Comment
Comment