So Gavin Rees in 80-1 to beat Broner

[D-MiZe]

Wow, Douglas was 42/1 i believe...so this guy is supposed to be twice the underdog?? But yet Rees is rated #5 or #6 at the division according to Ring Magazine?

Yet he hasn't proved himself above European level at lightweight. The huge underdog status is deserving, at least Douglas was proven at a certain level.

[johnm is...]

He's not 80/1.

[pugilistprophet1994]

Lol I'll be back i'm gonna go put 45 bucks on Rees. WAR REES!

[dan_cov]

He isn't 80/1 at all, he is around 12/1 with one place offering 25/1.

[Bodyshot3]

William Hill has Rees at 12/1 which seems kind of tight but sensible.....Rees is a rank outsider in a two-dog race but he's not a muppet, he's also won a proper world title belt and hits hard enough to ruin the form book and is also in tip-top shape.

If someone is offering 80/1 you'd better check they are legit and not some spotty kid hiding in their bedroom.

Reckon 15/1 sounds right to have a proper punt on a Rees win....12/1 is stingy but that's WH for you.

[daggum]

im betting my house on rees. if he wins i get 80 houses! awesome!

[whoelibits]

Go to oddschecker (http://www.oddschecker.com/boxing/ad...in-rees/winner) for the actual odds.

Better to stick a Broner in with an accumulator. Say Price, Frampton and Broner all win - that's a 1.49 multiplier with Bwin. All certainties imo.

[shade darkar]

I’m old enough to remember people saying the same thing about Buster Douglas, more so, much more so in fact.

People just laughed it off. What a joke, he’s got no chance.

Never count your chickens, when you gonna learn? THIS IS BOXING.

just my opinion, i think rees has got no chance, i could be wrong, but thats just what i think.

[Russian Crushin]

Oh yea well Proksa is a 160-1 favorite

Beat that