Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Carl Froch or Joe Calzaghe? Better resume?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by gingeralbino View Post
    Joe but Froch is catching up REALLY quickly
    aye.

    it's almost as if comparing froch's last 5 fights to calzaghe's entire 15 yr. career is an insult.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Post
      same kessler.


      and after 2 fights , it's obvious jean pascal is on hopkins level.
      Shot Eubank > Pascal

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by TRAV1$ View Post
        Shot Eubank > Pascal
        yes but shot AND weightdrained eubank = pascal

        Comment


        • #14
          Froch clearly fought the tougher competition.

          Calzaghe has a slightly better resume at the moment but Froch is on the verge of overtaking him.

          Comment


          • #15
            Calzaghe

            Don't need to explain

            Comment


            • #16
              Calz has a slightly better resume since he beat Duh Executioner and Kessler, but Froch doesn't need much more to surpass Calzaghe's resume.

              Comment


              • #17
                Froch is about to fight a guy Calzaghe ducked 3 different times. That tells you all you need to know.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by Heebarican View Post
                  Calz has a slightly better resume since he beat Duh Executioner and Kessler, but Froch doesn't need much more to surpass Calzaghe's resume.
                  the hopkins win was a SD (which means joe really didn't beat hopkins) it's not even worth mentioning since MANY feel that joe lost it (and joe REFUSED a rematch to prove otherwise) calzaghie did beat kessler......

                  i would say froch's resume looks a bit better to be honest.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    i don't think it catches up to calzaghe's competition yet
                    but now that i think about it im impressed at the lvl of competition froch has fought in the last years wouldn't have been possible without the super 6
                    guys like pacquiao should learn from it

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by elgranluchadore View Post
                      i don't think it catches up to calzaghe's competition yet
                      but now that i think about it im impressed at the lvl of competition froch has fought in the last years wouldn't have been possible without the super 6
                      guys like pacquiao should learn from it
                      ehhh..... pacquiao had a better run before without a tournament.

                      people are underrating pacquiao too much.

                      it seems like he's been taking on easy fights but if you look at it , he's fight the best welterweights ranked. (aside from floyd)

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP